Skip to main content

Is ithaka.org a Scam? Security Check Results - ithaka.org Reviews

ithaka.org favicon

Is ithaka.org Safe? Security Analysis for Home - ITHAKA

Check if ithaka.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:55:45 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI analysis incomplete. Run a Rescan to get comprehensive AI-powered insights including business intelligence, technology detection, and security observations.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "X-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM https://firefly.jstor.org https://www.jstor.org"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 224-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx exists:%{i}.spf.hc5909-85.iphmx.com include:_spf.act-on.net include:u1397501.wl.sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.ultipro.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:akz210.mta.exacttarget.com ~all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(224-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:ITI_Win_DMARC@ithaka.org
Forensic Reports:ITI_Win_DMARC@ithaka.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(359 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:23.185.0.2
Name Servers:
usmiaa1ns03.ithaka.org
usnjpr2ns01.ithaka.org
usnjpr2ns02.ithaka.org
usnjpr2ns04.ithaka.org
usnyny1ns05.ithaka.org
MX Records:
10: mx1.hc5909-85.iphmx.com
100: smtp2.ithaka.org
100: smtp1.ithaka.org
10: mx2.hc5909-85.iphmx.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090304, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:333ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx exists:%{i}.spf.hc5909-85.iphmx.com include:_spf.act-on.net include:u1397501.wl.sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.ultipro.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:akz210.mta.exacttarget.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

Analyze Another Website