Skip to main content

Is itower.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Itower Reviews

itower.lv favicon

Is itower.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Itower

Check if itower.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle reCAPTCHA v3+3 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 4:16:11 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Itower is a small Latvian company specializing in WordPress website design, development, hosting, SEO optimization, and social media marketing. Established since at least 2015, the company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional WordPress solutions. Their website showcases a portfolio of client projects and includes client testimonials, indicating a trusted market presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and several popular plugins, including Contact Form 7 and WPML for multilingual support. The site employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy with moderate technical performance and good mobile optimization.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Contact Form 7 pluginWPML (multilingual plugin)Enfold theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Itower operates in the technology sector as a service provider focused on WordPress solutions. Their business model revolves around custom website design, consulting, hosting, SEO, and social media marketing services. The company maintains partnerships with various client businesses showcased on their site, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of multilingual support suggests targeting a broader regional audience. Testimonials and portfolio evidence client satisfaction and project diversity. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a consistent brand identity and a clear market niche in Latvia. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web development and ongoing hosting and marketing services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@itower.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented on the contact form to mitigate spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No public security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing security policies and adding security headers to enhance protection and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Itower

Description:

Mēs esam wordpress dizaineri. Piedāvājam izstrādāt mājas lapu, sniegt konsultācijas, uzlabot esošu lapu. Hostings. SEO optimizācija. SMM.

Key Services:
WordPress website design and developmentConsultationsWebsite improvementsHostingSEO optimizationSocial Media Marketing (SMM)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Contact Form 7 pluginWPML (multilingual plugin)Enfold theme
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSEnfold WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional WordPress design and development service provider based in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +a:dtbmails.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:65.108.105.92
Name Servers:
ns1.itower.lvDNS only
ns2.itower.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.itower.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025042501, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +a:dtbmails.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme, with plugins such as Contact Form 7 and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking, with Google reCAPTCHA v3 protecting the contact form. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit hosting provider information. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website