Skip to main content

Is ivgrupa.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - BIO-kanalizacijas.lv Reviews

ivgrupa.lv favicon

Is ivgrupa.lv Safe? Security Analysis for BIO-kanalizacijas.lv

Check if ivgrupa.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.1WooCommerce 7.9.0Elementor 3.5.6Yoast SEO 19.0Google Fonts+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:32:39 PM
35
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BIO-kanalizacijas.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in sewage system installation, biological treatment equipment, septic tanks, and connections to central utility networks. The company emphasizes quality, competitive pricing, and customer service, supported by over 15 years of experience. Their website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, providing a modern and responsive user experience. While the site is well-structured and professional, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager shows moderate user tracking. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy based on content and testimonials, but WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust verification.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.1WooCommerce 7.9.0Elementor 3.5.6Yoast SEO 19.0Google FontsjQuery 3.7.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets residential and commercial property owners in Latvia needing sewage and utility connection services. Their business model combines service provision with an online store. Competitive advantages include free consultations, certified materials, and guarantees on quality and deadlines. The partnership with ivsolar.lv suggests diversification into renewable energy solutions. The company maintains a consistent brand and positive customer feedback, positioning itself as a reliable local specialist in the energy and real estate sectors.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@ivgrupa.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712812****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and employs spam protection on contact forms, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Google Analytics tracking is implemented, but without clear privacy disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance headers, privacy compliance, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BIO-kanalizacijas.lv

Description:

Company offers services related to sewage systems, biological treatment equipment, septic tanks, connections to central sewage and gas networks, and rainwater drainage systems. They provide free consultations, site inspections, and cost estimates.

Key Services:
Sewage systems for private housesBiological treatment equipmentSeptic tanksSewage tanksConnections to central gas and sewage networksRainwater drainage system construction
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.1WooCommerce 7.9.0Elementor 3.5.6Yoast SEO 19.0Google FontsjQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks:
WordPressWooCommerceElementor
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of contact forms with honeypot plugin for spam protection

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ip4:94.100.11.110 ip4:94.100.11.112 ?all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:5.45.127.65
Name Servers:
ns1.itcg.lvDNS only
ns2.itcg.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.ivgrupa.lv
SOA:Serial: 2024070301, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ip4:94.100.11.110 ip4:94.100.11.112 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with WooCommerce for e-commerce and Elementor for page building. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery 3.7.1. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. No hosting provider information is directly available. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. There is no evidence of CDN or advanced caching beyond WP Rocket lazy loading. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy implementations need strengthening.
Analyze Another Website