Skip to main content

Is janex-buve.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Janex-buve Reviews

janex-buve.lv favicon

Is janex-buve.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Janex-buve

Check if janex-buve.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsLayerSlider plugin+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:22:56 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Janex-buve is a Latvian small business specializing in construction, repair, transport, and household master services. With over 11 years of experience and nearly a thousand satisfied clients, it serves local customers primarily in Sigulda and Riga. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins for sliders and forms, hosted by Starflix hosting. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and no visible security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating low privacy compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsLayerSlider pluginRevolution Slider pluginContact Form 7 pluginVisual Composer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Janex-buve operates as a local service provider in Latvia offering passenger and cargo transport, construction and repair works, household master services, and excavator-loader services. The business model focuses on direct service delivery to local residents and businesses. The company leverages WordPress for its digital presence but lacks advanced marketing and analytics tools. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited focus on regulatory compliance. The company maintains social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest, enhancing customer engagement. The hosting provider is Starflix, indicating a local hosting choice. The business appears stable with a moderate market position but could improve trust signals by publishing certifications and security policies.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

288*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found. The use of popular WordPress plugins requires regular updates to avoid known vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Janex-buve

Description:

Janex-buve is a company primarily engaged in construction and repair works, including small repairs and household master services. They offer passenger and cargo transport, construction and repair services, home master services, and excavator-loader services. The business targets local customers in Latvia, especially in Sigulda and Riga areas.

Key Services:
Passenger transportCargo transportConstruction and repair worksHousehold master servicesExcavator-loader services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsLayerSlider pluginRevolution Slider pluginContact Form 7 pluginVisual Composer
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:163.172.52.14
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.janex-buve.lv
SOA:Serial: 1489147642, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins such as LayerSlider, Revolution Slider, Contact Form 7, and Visual Composer. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Hosting is provided by Starflix, a local hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident caching or CDN usage. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. No analytics or tracking tools are integrated. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could be modernized for better performance and security.
Analyze Another Website