Skip to main content

Is janus.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Janus Henderson Investors Reviews

janus.com favicon

Is janus.com Safe? Security Analysis for Janus Henderson Investors

Check if janus.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Stateslarge
WordPressjQueryBrightcove Video PlayerOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:06:26 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Janus Henderson Investors is a global asset management firm providing innovative investment solutions to a broad audience including institutional clients and individual investors. The company positions itself as a trusted partner in the finance industry with a strong digital presence. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly visible. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism and compliance with privacy regulations, but the lack of WHOIS transparency slightly impacts trust from a domain registration perspective.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryBrightcove Video PlayerOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag ManagerYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Janus Henderson operates in the finance sector with a focus on asset management and investment services. The business model centers on delivering tailored investment products and advisory services to a global client base. The website's content and structure indicate a large enterprise with consistent branding and a comprehensive marketing ecosystem. The company leverages multiple advertising and tracking platforms to optimize outreach and engagement. While the domain registration details are not publicly available, the brand's market presence and digital maturity suggest a well-established organization with significant market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, enhancing protection against common web threats. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security monitoring to mitigate risks from external dependencies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with more explicit security governance disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Janus Henderson Investors

Description:

Janus Henderson, a global asset manager, brings people and ideas together to deliver innovative investment solutions.

Key Services:
Investment managementAsset management solutionsFinancial advisory
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryBrightcove Video PlayerOneTrust Cookie ConsentGoogle Tag ManagerYoast SEO
Frameworks:
Understrap (WordPress theme framework)
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsLinkedIn InsightFacebook AnalyticsCrazy Egg
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
StackAdaptSpotifyTeads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics via GTMCrazy Egg
Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on asset management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:152.70.150.118 ip4:129.213.11.79 ip4:54.206.100.38 ip4:54.252.140.26 ip4:149.72.73.9 ip4:149.72.210.104 ip4:168.245.112.235 ip4:195.88.229.201 ip4:195.88.229.205 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@janushenderson.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:janushenderson.com
Issuer:Corporation Service Company RSA OV SSL CA
Valid Until:6/9/2026 (276 days)
SANs:janushenderson.com, www.janushenderson.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain dev.janushenderson.com points to unregistered service duzjgw85sgo1b.cloudfront.net

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(391 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.21, 3.174.113.124, 3.174.113.33, 3.174.113.41
AAAA Records:2600:9000:28f7:d600:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:c200:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:2c00:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:f200:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:8800:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:c400:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:8000:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1, 2600:9000:28f7:7600:2:b4c1:c6c0:93a1
Name Servers:
udns1.cscdns.net
udns2.cscdns.uk
MX Records:
10: janushenderson-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2019101936, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:137ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:152.70.150.118 ip4:129.213.11.79 ip4:54.206.100.38 ip4:54.252.140.26 ip4:149.72.73.9 ip4:149.72.210.104 ip4:168.245.112.235 ip4:195.88.229.201 ip4:195.88.229.205 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Understrap theme framework, enhanced with custom plugins and integrations such as Brightcove for video playback and OneTrust for cookie management. It uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for interactivity. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Tag Manager orchestrates analytics and marketing tags. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of third-party scripts. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring and optimization are recommended to maintain performance and security.
Analyze Another Website