Is jarvisexchange.com Safe? Security Analysis for iEXExchanger FZCO
https://jarvisexchange.comCheck if jarvisexchange.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
JARVIS Exchange, operated by iEXExchanger FZCO, is a cryptocurrency and fiat currency exchange platform primarily targeting Russian-speaking users. The platform offers services including crypto-to-fiat exchange, mass payments, and API integration, positioning itself as a reliable and established player with over 3 years of operation and positive user feedback. The website is built on a modern Angular framework, leveraging Cloudflare DNS and Google Fonts, and includes interactive features such as a live chat widget and Telegram support bot. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, CSRF tokens, and domain transfer protection, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit incident response contacts are publicly listed. Overall, the platform demonstrates a moderate to good security posture and technical maturity, with room for improvement in transparency and DNS security. The website content is professional, well-structured, and free from adult or questionable content, making it suitable for a general audience interested in cryptocurrency exchange services.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the finance sector, focusing on cryptocurrency exchange services with a medium-sized operational scale. It maintains partnerships with reputable crypto monitoring and review platforms such as BestChange, TrustPilot, and BitcoinTalk, enhancing its market credibility. The business model revolves around facilitating crypto and fiat currency exchanges, mass payments, and providing API access for integration. The target audience includes individual traders and businesses in Russian-speaking regions. The company leverages digital marketing tools including Telegram bots and chat widgets to engage customers. The domain age and registration details align with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of publicly available incident response contacts and security.txt files suggests an opportunity to strengthen trust and compliance.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS services, which provide baseline protection against common web threats. Security best practices observed include the use of CSRF tokens and domain transfer lock status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy were detected in the HTML source, which could be improved. The lack of a published security.txt or incident response contact information limits the platform's readiness for coordinated vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting additional DNS and HTTP security measures and improving transparency around security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
iEXExchanger FZCO
Надежный обмен криптовалют по выгодному курсу. Продажа, обмен криптовалют в обменном сервисе электронных валют JARVIS Exchange. 3 года безупречной работы, >1000 отзывов.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- CSRF token present in meta tag
- Use of Cloudflare DNS and protection
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 63 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about jarvisexchange.com
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published