Skip to main content

Is jdpay.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 京东支付 Reviews

jdpay.com favicon

Is jdpay.com Safe? Security Analysis for 京东支付

Check if jdpay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceChinalarge
jQuery 1.12.4Swiper 4.0.2JavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:16:01 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

京东支付 is a major Chinese internet payment platform affiliated with JD.com, offering a comprehensive suite of online and offline payment products and industry-specific digital solutions. The website targets merchants and enterprises seeking integrated payment services, leveraging JD.com's extensive ecosystem and brand recognition. Technically, the site uses established JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data is missing or inconsistent, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the strong business presence and trust indicators mitigate this risk. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and functional, serving a large enterprise audience in the finance and e-commerce sectors.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.12.4Swiper 4.0.2JavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

京东支付 holds a strong market position as a payment service provider within the JD.com ecosystem, targeting merchants across multiple industries with rich product offerings including APP payments, H5 payments, and aggregated payment channels. The business model focuses on facilitating seamless payment processing and settlement for merchants, supported by professional integration teams. The presence of multiple certifications and regulatory licenses enhances credibility. The company benefits from strategic partnerships within JD.com's network and serves a large customer base, indicating significant revenue potential and growth opportunities. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data is unusual and should be monitored. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence with consistent branding and clear navigation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@jd.com

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness signals. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact privacy compliance, especially under GDPR-like regulations. The site does not appear to use vulnerable libraries but relies on older jQuery versions. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting modern security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing privacy compliance features.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

京东支付

Description:

京东金融综合互联网理财服务,基金理财,金融服务,敬请享受! 提供线上线下丰富的收款、付款、资金类等产品,帮助商家解决支付及资金清分结算问题。

Key Services:
APP支付H5支付聚合支付行业数字化解决方案
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.12.4Swiper 4.0.2JavaScriptCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
qidian-sdk
Marketing Tools:
qidian-sdk
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:211.151.32.0/25 ip4:211.151.68.128/25 ip4:58.83.160.0/28 ip4:58.83.238.0/24 ip4:211.151.190.160/27 ip4:58.83.158.0/24 ip4:58.83.206.0/24 ip4:198.11.203.194 ip4:174.36.199.245 ip4:111.206.226.0/24 a:mx.jd.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Short HSTS Max-Age

LOW

HSTS max-age is less than 1 year

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:111.202.65.19, 123.182.167.95, 211.152.0.69
AAAA Records:2403:a200:a200:11c4::17c
Name Servers:
ns1.jdcache.comDNS only
ns2.jdcache.comDNS only
ns3.jdcache.comDNS only
ns4.jdcache.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2016115214, TTL: 38400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:321ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:211.151.32.0/25 ip4:211.151.68.128/25 ip4:58.83.160.0/28 ip4:58.83.238.0/24 ip4:211.151.190.160/27 ip4:58.83.158.0/24 ip4:58.83.206.0/24 ip4:198.11.203.194 ip4:174.36.199.245 ip4:111.206.226.0/24 a:mx.jd.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 1.12.4 and Swiper 4.0.2 for UI components and interactivity. CSS and JavaScript files are served from JD.com controlled domains and CDN storage, indicating a robust hosting environment likely backed by JD.com's infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design elements. No modern frameworks like React or Vue are detected, suggesting a legacy or hybrid architecture. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimization. No CMS is identified, implying a custom-built platform. Overall, the technical implementation is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website