Is jeff-app.com Safe? Security Analysis for SIA JEFF
Check if jeff-app.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Jeff is a fintech company operating digital marketplaces that connect underbanked populations in emerging markets with financial products. The company offers services such as lead generation, data APIs, rejected client exchanges, and embedded partnerships to banks, lenders, telcos, insurance companies, eCommerce, and mobility sectors. With over 10 million users and presence in six countries, Jeff positions itself as a trusted partner in financial inclusion. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Webflow and Google Tag Manager. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS data slightly reduce trust and compliance confidence. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, Jeff demonstrates a solid business model and technical maturity with room for enhanced privacy compliance and transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Jeff targets emerging markets with a focus on financial inclusion by leveraging digital footprints and alternative data to offer credit and financial products. Its business model is B2B2C, partnering with financial institutions and other sectors to provide qualified leads and data insights. The company has secured EU regional development funding and has received media coverage from reputable tech outlets, indicating growth and market validation. The partnership ecosystem spans banks, mobile wallets, telcos, insurance, eCommerce, and delivery sectors, reflecting a broad and strategic approach to market penetration. The company is medium-sized, founded in 2021, and headquartered in Latvia. The lack of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or recent domain registration, which is common in fintech startups.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS, uses no outdated or vulnerable libraries, and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are found, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, reducing readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
SIA JEFF
Jeff team builds data driven online marketplaces that connect people in the emerging world with best available financial products.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 72 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
HSTS Missing includeSubDomains
LOWHSTS header does not include subdomains
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings