Skip to main content

Is jelgavaslaivas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA “Purva Pasaule” Reviews

jelgavaslaivas.lv favicon

Is jelgavaslaivas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA “Purva Pasaule”

Check if jelgavaslaivas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginContact Form 7MetaSliderJetpack+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:08:42 AM
30
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Jelgavaslaivas.lv is a small Latvian business specializing in romantic illuminated canoe rides and event hosting in Jelgava. The website presents a niche tourism service with a focus on local cultural and leisure experiences, targeting residents and visitors interested in unique evening boat trips. The business provides clear contact information, social media presence, and company registration details, supporting its legitimacy. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, hosted on SiteGround, and shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and use of security plugins, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginContact Form 7MetaSliderJetpackjQueryFlexSlider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the hospitality and transportation sectors, offering illuminated canoe rides and related events. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on experiential tourism in Jelgava. The presence of gift cards and workshops suggests diversified revenue streams. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers. The market position is niche and local, with a small business scale. The website content and branding are consistent and professionally presented, supporting customer trust. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies may limit appeal to privacy-conscious users and regulatory compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@jelgavaslaivas.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712676****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA “Purva Pasaule”

Registration Number:

40203402974

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable WordPress security plugins like Jetpack and Akismet, which provide baseline protection against common threats. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The contact forms are standard but no explicit anti-spam or input validation details are visible. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contacts, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA “Purva Pasaule”

Description:

Romantiski izgaismoto Jelgavas Laivu mājas lapa ar publikso pasākumu kalendāru un piedāvajumu Jūsu svētkiem - pasvaldībai vai draugu grupai.

Key Services:
Romantic illuminated canoe ridesEvent calendar and bookingsGift cardsWorkshops at Gallery “LAIVA”
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginContact Form 7MetaSliderJetpackjQueryFlexSlider
Frameworks:
WordPress theme Twenty Seventeen
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Jetpack, Akismet)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEOJetpack
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based small business site offering illuminated canoe rides in Jelgava, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.182.163 include:jelgavaslaivas.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.185.23
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Twenty Seventeen theme, with plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, MetaSlider, and Jetpack. Hosting is provided by SiteGround, a reputable provider. The site uses jQuery and FlexSlider for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical issues or broken elements were found. The site uses standard meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website