Skip to main content

Is jenni.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - Jenni AI Reviews

jenni.ai favicon

Is jenni.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Jenni AI

Check if jenni.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationN/asmall
JavaScriptPostHog analyticsSegment analyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 11:00:06 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Jenni AI is a small technology company specializing in AI-powered academic writing assistance. Their website presents a focused business model targeting students and academic users, offering AI tools to improve writing efficiency while maintaining user control. The company was founded in 2019 and operates in the education sector. Technically, the website is built using Framer, integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as PostHog, Segment, and Cookiebot, and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, though a cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate startup profile, with no suspicious indicators. The website content is safe and appropriate for a general audience.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptPostHog analyticsSegment analyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Jenni AI occupies a niche market in academic AI assistance, leveraging AI technology to support writing tasks. Their business model likely revolves around SaaS or subscription-based access to AI tools. The company targets students and academic professionals, positioning itself as a specialized AI assistant. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is common for startups and does not raise concerns. The marketing ecosystem includes major analytics and advertising platforms, indicating a focus on user acquisition and engagement. The absence of direct contact information and formal policies suggests room for maturity in corporate transparency and compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has client transfer protection on the domain, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are published, which limits transparency in security management. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the surface for privacy risks, though cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Jenni AI

Description:

Jenni is your AI assistant for all things in your academic journey. We specialise in developing AI that helps you make your writing more efficient, while still keeping control.

Key Services:
AI writing assistanceacademic writing support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptPostHog analyticsSegment analyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
PostHogSegmentHubSpot AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
HubSpot
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelSnapchat PixelTikTok PixelBing Ads
Marketing Tools:
SegmentPostHogCookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:242992517.spf01.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:e2dc933364444e568e2d26f9402d2130@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 11 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(expired)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
danica.ns.cloudflare.com
tate.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379355221, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:242992517.spf01.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including PostHog, Segment, HubSpot, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from additional security hardening and formal compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website