Skip to main content

Is jetway.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf Reviews

jetway.io favicon

Is jetway.io Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Check if jetway.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.3.1Webflow
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:35:58 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Jetway.io is a small technology business specializing in educational toolkits for user onboarding, offering a 7-lesson video course, workbook, and customer journey map. The website is professionally designed using Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is limited to a single email address. Overall, the site is trustworthy and focused on a niche market of SaaS product managers and UX professionals.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.3.1Webflow

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Jetway.io operates in the technology education sector, targeting SaaS developers and product teams seeking to improve user onboarding experiences. The business model centers on selling digital educational products. The domain age and content consistency suggest a legitimate small business with a focused market position. Partnerships with onboarding.pro and mockuthon.com indicate a network within the onboarding and UX community. The lack of extensive contact details and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in business operations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@jetway.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which reduces its security score. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No analytics or tracking services beyond Tooltip player are detected, limiting privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Description:

Framework for building first-time user experiences. A 7-lesson video course and workbook: everything you need to create an effective user onboarding experience from scratch.

Key Services:
7-lesson video courseUser onboarding workbookCustomer journey map
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.3.1Webflow
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Tooltip player
Marketing Tools:
Tooltip player
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(185 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.109.153, 185.199.108.153, 185.199.111.153, 185.199.110.153
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1573465047, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:124ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies including jQuery 3.3.1. It uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting, which supports good performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and no advanced analytics or tracking tools are detected. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical risks that should be addressed to improve security posture.
Analyze Another Website