Skip to main content

Is jifo.co a Scam? Security Check Results - INFOGRAM SIA Reviews

I

Is jifo.co Safe? Security Analysis for INFOGRAM SIA

Check if jifo.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:21:21 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain jifo.co is registered to INFOGRAM SIA, a Latvian company established in 2013. The website content is currently inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking, presenting an Access Denied error page. This prevents any direct analysis of the website's content, metadata, or technical implementation. The domain registration data is consistent and indicates a legitimate business presence with a moderate domain age and protection against unauthorized transfers. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of published privacy, cookie, or security policies limits the ability to assess compliance and security posture. The hosting provider is Cloudflare, but DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. Overall, the website's digital maturity and business credibility cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

INFOGRAM SIA appears to be a small-sized company based in Latvia with a domain registered since 2013. No business description, services, or market positioning information is available from the website due to content inaccessibility. The lack of visible contact information or social media presence further limits insights into their business operations or customer engagement. The domain registration is consistent with the company’s location and no suspicious patterns are detected. Without accessible content, no conclusions can be drawn about revenue streams, partnerships, or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is protected by Cloudflare's WAF, which currently blocks access resulting in an Access Denied error. This indicates some level of security control but also prevents external analysis. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available for review. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information are found. The overall security posture cannot be fully assessed but is likely minimal based on available data. The domain registration status clientTransferProhibited is a positive trust indicator.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Review and adjust Cloudflare WAF settings to allow legitimate access for analysis and users.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

Access Denied error page with Cloudflare nameservers indicates Cloudflare WAF blocking or access restriction.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

INFOGRAM SIA

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking with Access Denied error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:jifo.co
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:11/10/2025 (64 days)
SANs:*.jifo.co, jifo.co

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(167 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.42.172, 172.66.167.218
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:a7da, 2606:4700:10::6814:2aac
Name Servers:
george.ns.cloudflare.com
serena.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2380515060, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Due to the website being blocked by Cloudflare WAF, no technical details such as CMS, frameworks, scripts, or performance metrics could be extracted. The domain uses Cloudflare nameservers indicating CDN and security services. WHOIS data shows registration with Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No metadata or structured data is present in the accessible content. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of SEO, accessibility, or mobile optimization.
Analyze Another Website