Skip to main content

Is jmpost.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - J.M. POST Reviews

J

Is jmpost.cz Safe? Security Analysis for J.M. POST

Check if jmpost.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCzech Republicsmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsYouTube embedded videosJavaScript+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:17:14 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

J.M. POST is a Czech Republic-based IT service provider established in 1994, specializing in web development, e-commerce solutions, custom software, and online marketing services. The company serves a diverse clientele including small and medium businesses, large enterprises, public institutions, and international partners. Their website demonstrates a solid technical infrastructure with HTTPS, modern JavaScript libraries, and integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS data and privacy documentation suggests areas for improvement.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsYouTube embedded videosJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position as a comprehensive IT solutions provider with over 2,000 completed projects. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored web and software solutions alongside digital marketing and IT hardware services. Key revenue streams likely include custom software development, e-shop creation, and marketing campaigns. The target customer base spans SMEs to large organizations and government entities. Partnerships with local payment gateways such as Comgate, GP webpay, ČSOB, and GiroCheckout enhance their e-commerce offerings. The company’s longevity and detailed service portfolio indicate stable growth and a well-established ecosystem.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

o*****@ustipost.cz
t*****@ustipost.cz

Phone Numbers (2)

+4206034*****
+4206066*****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

J.M. POST

VAT Number:

CZ7203172922

Registration Number:

621 92 981

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted data transmission, and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Forms use POST methods, reducing risk of data exposure. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also poses compliance risks under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

J.M. POST

Description:

Firma J.M. POST byla založena v roce 1994 a poskytuje komplexní služby v oblasti softwarových a hardwarových technologií, včetně tvorby webových stránek, e-shopů, online marketingu, ERP, CRM a servisu PC a sítí. Společnost realizovala více než 2 000 internetových projektů pro malé, střední i velké firmy, státní správu a zahraniční partnery.

Key Services:
Web design and developmentE-shop creationCustom software developmentSEO and PPC campaignsSocial media managementGraphic designMarketingERP and CRM solutionsHardware, PC networks, and PC servicing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsYouTube embedded videosJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads (AW-1025325135)Google Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Google Fonts
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.2.216.10
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: mxavas.forpsi.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072801, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Fonts and YouTube embeds for multimedia content. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with multiple CSS stylesheets targeting different screen sizes. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides clear navigation and structured content. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended to modernize the platform.
Analyze Another Website