Skip to main content

Is jnails.info a Scam? Security Check Results - J Nails Reviews

jnails.info favicon

Is jnails.info Safe? Security Analysis for J Nails

Check if jnails.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
Hostinger Website BuilderGoogle Fonts (Poppins)Astro frameworkZyro ecommerce platform
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:22:09 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

J Nails is a small, local beauty service provider specializing in professional nail care services including hygienic manicure, gel polish application, and nail design, primarily serving clients in Riga, Latvia. The website is well-structured and provides clear information about services, contact details, and social media presence, positioning the business as a trustworthy local salon. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Astro and hosted on Hostinger with Zyro ecommerce integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts for consistent branding. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust. Privacy compliance is partial with a cookie consent banner present but no privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the business appears legitimate and professional but could improve compliance and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Hostinger Website BuilderGoogle Fonts (Poppins)Astro frameworkZyro ecommerce platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

J Nails operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on nail care services for a local clientele in Riga. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement through online booking and contact forms. The company leverages social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok for marketing and customer engagement. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common for small businesses. The website content and design indicate a consistent brand identity and a focus on quality and client satisfaction. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@jnails.info

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712848****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced security. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security incidents. WHOIS privacy protection is used, which is justified for this business type but limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

J Nails

Description:

Piedāvājam profesionālas nagu kopšanas pakalpojumus Rīgā - manikīrs un nagu dizains. Vēlamies katram klientam sniegt izcilu un individuāli pielāgotu pieredzi.

Key Services:
Hygienic manicureClassic manicure with gel polishGel nail correctionNail design
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Hostinger Website BuilderGoogle Fonts (Poppins)Astro frameworkZyro ecommerce platform
Frameworks:
Astro
Platforms:
Zyro ecommerce
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed small business site for a nail salon in Riga, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.jnails.info
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:10/4/2025 (65 days)
SANs:www.jnails.info

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(80 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.120.137.41
AAAA Records:2600:1901:0:84ef::
Name Servers:
ns1.dns-parking.com
ns2.dns-parking.com
MX Records:
5: mx1.hostinger.com
10: mx2.hostinger.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger with Zyro ecommerce integration, indicating a modern and modular technical infrastructure. Google Fonts are used for typography consistency. The site includes video backgrounds and responsive images optimized for different devices, contributing to good mobile optimization and user experience. Performance is moderate, with no heavy analytics or tracking scripts detected, which benefits privacy and speed. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation.
Analyze Another Website