Skip to main content

Is jobimeo.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Jobimeo Reviews

jobimeo.de favicon

Is jobimeo.de Safe? Security Analysis for Jobimeo

Check if jobimeo.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
JavaScriptMatomo Analytics
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:49:37 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Jobimeo is a German technology platform offering a free video application creation tool for job seekers. The website provides users with the ability to record webcam videos, upload resumes, and receive tips to enhance their job applications. The platform targets individuals seeking to differentiate themselves in the job market through personalized video presentations. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and Matomo analytics, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy compliance is partially met with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy but no cookie banner. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMatomo Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Jobimeo operates in the niche market of video job applications within Germany, targeting job seekers who want to create personalized video presentations. The business model is based on free user registration and providing video creation tools. The company appears small and focused on technology services. The partnership with jobsaround.tv suggests a strategic alliance in video or job-related services. The platform's competitive advantage lies in simplifying video applications with integrated tips and resume uploads. Growth potential exists in expanding features and improving compliance. No direct revenue streams or parent company information are available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure form inputs. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, and no security contact information is provided. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Jobimeo

Description:

Erstelle mit jobimeo in wenigen Minuten deine persönliche Video-Bewerbung – inklusive smarter Tipps, Webcam-Recording & Lebenslauf-Upload. So sicherst du dir den Traumjob!

Key Services:
Video application creationWebcam recordingResume uploadSmart tips for applications
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMatomo Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form inputs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:46.38.226.121
Name Servers:
ns3.ai-dns.de
ns5.kasserver.com
ns5.name-server-kas.de
ns6.kasserver.com
MX Records:
10: w00ab7ec.kasserver.com
SOA:Serial: 2503311004, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with Matomo analytics for user tracking. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability on various devices. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website