Skip to main content

Is jorphyy.store a Scam? Security Check Results - jorphyy.store Reviews

jorphyy.store favicon

Is jorphyy.store Safe? Security Analysis for jorphyy.store

Check if jorphyy.store is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking scripts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:04:57 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ww1.jorphyy.store is a parked domain with minimal content primarily consisting of advertising blocks and related search iframes. There is no clear business description, contact information, or services offered, indicating it is not an active commercial site. The technical infrastructure relies on basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with integration of Google Adsense and Bodis domain parking scripts. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms, which significantly lowers its security posture. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder or monetization page rather than a legitimate business website.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No identifiable business entity or market positioning is evident from the website content. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS data, which is not justified by any legitimate business presence. The site’s business model appears to be domain parking and advertising revenue generation. There are no signs of partnerships, subsidiaries, or professional branding. The lack of contact details and business information suggests low credibility and no active customer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible security policies or incident response information. The site exposes visitors to potential risks such as man-in-the-middle attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information is provided. The use of third-party advertising scripts without visible controls may introduce additional risks. Overall, the site does not follow best security practices and poses a low trust risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder page with minimal content, primarily showing ads and related search iframes. No clear business description or services are provided.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis domain parking scripts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense cookie.js
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain with minimal content

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:5.79.68.109
Name Servers:
ns1.badgerdns.comDNS only
ns2.badgerdns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025053100, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technology stack with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. Performance is moderate but limited by the lack of optimization and minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are lacking. SEO is poor due to missing meta tags and structured data. The site relies heavily on third-party advertising scripts from Google and Bodis, which may impact loading times and user experience. There is significant technical debt and modernization opportunities to improve professionalism and security.
Analyze Another Website