Skip to main content

Is journaldunet.fr a Scam? Security Check Results - JDN Reviews

journaldunet.fr favicon

Is journaldunet.fr Safe? Security Analysis for JDN

Check if journaldunet.fr is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaFrancelarge
Google Tag ManagerjQueryjQuery UIAkamai CDNCustom CCMCMS framework+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:25:39 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

JDN (Journal du Net) is a prominent French media website specializing in business, technology, economy, and public affairs news. It operates under the CCM Benchmark Group, a well-established media conglomerate affiliated with Groupe Figaro. The site offers a wide range of services including news articles, industry analysis, newsletters, and advertising opportunities, targeting a general audience interested in economic and technological developments in France and beyond. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and consistent branding, positioning it as a trusted source in the French media landscape. Technically, JDN employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, jQuery, and a proprietary CMS (CCMCMS), supported by Akamai CDN for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, ensuring a fast and user-friendly experience. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR-compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. Advertising is managed transparently through recognized ad networks like AppNexus and tracking services such as Weborama. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes some security headers, though there is room for improvement by adding additional headers and publishing explicit security policies. The presence of ISO 27001 certification indicates a mature security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given its brand recognition. Overall, JDN presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, good technical implementation, and solid privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and maintaining vigilance on third-party scripts and advertising practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerjQueryjQuery UIAkamai CDNCustom CCMCMS frameworkHTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

JDN holds a strong market position as a leading French business and technology news portal. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with CCM Benchmark Group and Groupe Figaro, providing access to a broad media ecosystem and diversified content. The business model relies on advertising revenue, newsletter subscriptions, and content syndication. Target customers include professionals, business leaders, and tech enthusiasts in France. Growth indicators include active content updates, extensive partnerships, and a wide range of subsidiary media brands. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking to multiple specialized media sites under the CCM Benchmark umbrella. Operationally, JDN demonstrates a mature digital presence with strategic use of modern web technologies and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

JDN exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script deployment, and ISO 27001 certification indicating formalized information security management. Security headers are present but could be enhanced with additional policies like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms incorporate recaptcha to mitigate spam and abuse. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap that should be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site balances security with usability effectively, though continuous monitoring and policy publication would strengthen its security culture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

JDN

Description:

Actualité, analyses, dossiers, tendances, interviews : tous les jours, JDN vous propose le meilleur de l'actualité

Key Services:
News articlesIndustry analysisNewsletter subscriptionsAdvertising
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerjQueryjQuery UIAkamai CDNCustom CCMCMS frameworkHTML5CSS3JavaScript
Frameworks:
CCMCMS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields and recaptcha for newsletter subscription

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerWeborama
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AppNexus
Tracking Pixels:
Weborama
Marketing Tools:
Weborama
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.248.250.0/23 ip4:91.209.35.0/24 ip4:194.169.240.0/24 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:ccmbenchmark@dmarc.postmastery.com
Forensic Reports:ccmbenchmark@dmarc.postmastery.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(81 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:194.169.240.6, 195.248.251.102
Name Servers:
a1-165.akam.net
a13-64.akam.net
a14-66.akam.net
a20-67.akam.net
a28-64.akam.net
a9-64.akam.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
3: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
3: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090202, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.248.250.0/23 ip4:91.209.35.0/24 ip4:194.169.240.0/24 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a proprietary CMS (CCMCMS) and leverages modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and jQuery UI. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Akamai CDN for content delivery, ensuring fast load times and global reach. The site is fully responsive with mobile optimization and accessibility considerations. SEO is well addressed through proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance incident response capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and scalable content delivery.
Analyze Another Website