Skip to main content

Is jove.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - JOVE TRADE INVEST Reviews

J

Is jove.lv Safe? Security Analysis for JOVE TRADE INVEST

Check if jove.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationN/asmall
WordPress 6.8.2Bricks themeBrickscore pluginAutomatic CSS pluginSplide.js slider+6 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:01:13 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

JOVE TRADE INVEST is a trading company specializing in import, export, market research, partner search, transaction support, and logistics services. The company positions itself as a provider of comprehensive trade solutions with a focus on competitive pricing, advanced technology, and flexible service offerings. The website is built on WordPress using the Bricks theme and several plugins to enhance user experience and visual appeal. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports mobile responsiveness and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registrant information. Overall, the website presents a professional business front but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Bricks themeBrickscore pluginAutomatic CSS pluginSplide.js sliderjQueryPopper.jsTippy.jsGSAPScrollTriggerSplitText

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets businesses requiring import/export and trade services, leveraging global market access and logistics expertise. Its competitive advantages include transparent pricing, advanced trading technology, and flexible import/export capabilities. The business model revolves around facilitating international trade transactions and providing market insights. The presence of partner logos suggests a networked ecosystem supporting its operations. However, the lack of explicit contact details and compliance documentation may hinder trust from potential clients. Growth indicators are not explicitly visible, and the company appears to be a small-sized entity focused on transportation and trade sectors.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

JOVE TRADE INVEST

Description:

JOVE TRADE INVEST provides a full range of services including market research, partner search, transaction support, logistics, export, import and trade, packaging and branding, shipping and customs clearance.

Key Services:
Market researchPartner searchTransaction supportLogisticsExportImportPackaging and brandingShipping and customs clearance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Bricks themeBrickscore pluginAutomatic CSS pluginSplide.js sliderjQueryPopper.jsTippy.jsGSAPScrollTriggerSplitText
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:45.88.104.113 ip4:77.83.175.222 a mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1304-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:45.88.104.113
Name Servers:
ns1.example.comDNS only
ns2.example.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: mail.jove.lv
10: mail.jove.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025030922, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:166ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:45.88.104.113 ip4:77.83.175.222 a mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Bricks theme and several advanced plugins for UI animations and sliders. The tech stack includes jQuery, Popper.js, Tippy.js, GSAP, and Splide.js, indicating a focus on interactive and responsive design. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive layouts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website