Skip to main content

Is jpegmini.com a Scam? Security Check Results - jpegmini.com Reviews

jpegmini.com favicon

Is jpegmini.com Safe? Security Analysis for JPEGmini | Leading JPEG Compressor & Image Size Reducer

Check if jpegmini.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelHotjarMailerLiteGrooveHQ+3 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:43:28 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

JPEGmini.com is a mature technology company specializing in JPEG compression and image size reduction tools. The website positions itself as a leading provider in this niche, targeting photographers, designers, and web developers who require efficient image optimization without quality loss. The business model appears to be SaaS and product sales, supported by a well-structured website with professional design and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Framer and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Plausible Analytics. Hosting is likely on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The domain is well aged and registered with GoDaddy, showing legitimacy and stable ownership. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelHotjarMailerLiteGrooveHQFastSpringPlausible AnalyticsTermly Cookie Consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on image compression software. It holds a strong market position as a leading JPEG compressor, serving a specialized audience. The business benefits from a mature domain and a clear digital presence, supported by integrated marketing and analytics platforms. Payment processing is handled via a partner domain on FastSpring, indicating a structured e-commerce setup. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company likely generates revenue through software sales and subscriptions, targeting professionals and general users needing image optimization. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing and customer support tools, enhancing operational efficiency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, indicating limited transparency in security practices. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing is balanced with potential privacy concerns due to moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and improving compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Reduce your image size without compromising on quality. Experience the best JPEG and image compression tool online.

Key Services:
JPEG compressionimage size reductiononline image compression tool
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelHotjarMailerLiteGrooveHQFastSpringPlausible AnalyticsTermly Cookie Consent
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security-related meta tags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)HotjarPlausible Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdRollFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHotjarPlausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
MailerLiteGrooveHQ
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern marketing and analytics tools.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com include:smtp.groovehq.com include:_spf.mlsend.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(409 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.68.128, 3.164.68.82, 3.164.68.46, 3.164.68.120
Name Servers:
ns-1533.awsdns-63.org
ns-1620.awsdns-10.co.uk
ns-337.awsdns-42.com
ns-746.awsdns-29.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com include:smtp.groovehq.com include:_spf.mlsend.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, supported by FastSpring for e-commerce. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Tag Manager for flexible analytics deployment and includes tracking pixels from Facebook and Hotjar for user behavior insights. Cookie consent is managed via Termly, indicating attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited accessibility features suggest opportunities for technical improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website