Is jpnp.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Jūrmalas namu pārvalde
Check if jpnp.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Jūrmalas namu pārvalde is a Latvian property management company specializing in residential real estate management and maintenance services. The company serves a significant client base of 1724 apartment owners covering over 58,000 square meters of managed property. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and the Gutenify theme, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and incident response details. Overall, the business appears legitimate and established locally, but the absence of WHOIS data and privacy compliance details suggests room for improvement in transparency and security.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the real estate sector focusing on property management in Jūrmala, Latvia. It has a medium-sized operation with multiple managed properties and a long-standing presence since 2008. The business model revolves around providing maintenance and management services to residential property owners. The website indicates a stable market position with a sizable client base and multiple property locations. The company maintains a Facebook presence but lacks broader digital marketing or analytics tools. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The site content is relevant and targeted to local residents and property owners, supporting a focused business approach.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no security contact emails are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Jūrmalas namu pārvalde
Nekustamā īpašuma pārvaldīšana un apsaimniekošana. The company manages residential properties, serving 1724 apartment owners with a total managed area of 58,431.63 m². It has multiple managed properties in Jūrmala, Latvia, with addresses and years of management provided.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a Latvian property management company.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings