Skip to main content

Is jspm.io a Scam? Security Check Results - c/o whoisproxy.com Reviews

C

Is jspm.io Safe? Security Analysis for c/o whoisproxy.com

Check if jspm.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
JavaScriptimportmapCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:35:50 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

JSPM.IO operates as a specialized CDN package provider supporting the JSPM project, targeting developers and technology users requiring efficient package delivery. The website presents a clean, modern interface with clear branding and links to the main JSPM project site, indicating a focused business model within the technology sector. The domain has been registered since 2013 and uses reputable infrastructure partners such as CacheFly and Cloudflare, supporting its market position as a niche service provider. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript features including import maps and leverages Cloudflare DNS and CacheFly hosting infrastructure, resulting in fast performance and good mobile optimization. SEO metadata is well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The absence of CMS or analytics scripts suggests a lightweight, performance-oriented design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks DNSSEC, explicit security headers, and published security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies are provided, which limits compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate technology service. Overall, JSPM.IO is a technically sound and professionally presented website serving a clear technology niche. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security transparency, which could be improved to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptimportmapCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

JSPM.IO is positioned as a technology service provider specializing in CDN package delivery for the JSPM ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in its integration with the JSPM project and use of high-performance infrastructure partners. The business model focuses on providing reliable package delivery services to developers and technology users. The absence of direct contact information and policies suggests a lean operation, possibly supported by the broader JSPM community. Growth indicators include a long domain age and partnerships with CacheFly and Cloudflare. The partnership ecosystem is limited but strategic, focusing on infrastructure and project alignment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The absence of contact channels for security incidents reduces the ability to handle potential threats effectively. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology service but would benefit from enhancements to align with industry standards and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

c/o whoisproxy.com

Description:

CDN Package Provider for the JSPM Project

Key Services:
CDN package delivery
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptimportmapCloudflare DNS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a technical landing page for a CDN package provider related to JSPM project

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(195 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:205.234.175.175
Name Servers:
mark.ns.cloudflare.com
sue.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382231808, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern JavaScript features including import maps and serves content over HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS and CacheFly hosting, resulting in fast load times and good mobile optimization. The site is lightweight with no detected CMS or analytics scripts, reducing attack surface and improving performance. SEO metadata is well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt that could be addressed to improve security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website