Skip to main content

Is jsuol.com.br a Scam? Security Check Results - jsuol.com.br Reviews

J

Is jsuol.com.br Safe? Security Analysis for jsuol.com.br

Check if jsuol.com.br is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherBrazilsmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:24:25 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at jsuol.com.br currently presents an empty HTML body with no visible content, metadata, or structured data, indicating it is either under construction, blocked, or otherwise inaccessible. The domain is registered with name servers under uol.com.br, a reputable Brazilian internet service provider, suggesting legitimacy of the domain registration. However, the lack of accessible content prevents a full assessment of the business, its services, or its security posture. Technically, no technologies, scripts, or security headers are detectable, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. This results in a low overall maturity and security posture score. The absence of contact information and policies further limits trust and compliance evaluation.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content and metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain's affiliation with UOL suggests it may be part of a larger internet service or media group, but no direct business model, market positioning, or services can be identified. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently poor due to lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosures or data protection officer information is available. The domain registration appears consistent and legitimate, but the website itself does not demonstrate any security best practices or compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy a functional website with meaningful content and metadata to enable proper analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is minimal (empty HTML body), indicating possible blocking or content restriction.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is empty, no metadata or visible content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:relays.uol.com.br -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.jsuol.com.br
Issuer:RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1
Valid Until:6/20/2026 (288 days)
SANs:*.jsuol.com.br, jsuol.com.br

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:186.234.166.12
AAAA Records:2804:49c:4208:405:ffff:ffff:ffff:3, 2804:49c:3102:401:ffff:ffff:ffff:50, 2804:49c:3101:401:ffff:ffff:ffff:50
Name Servers:
borges.uol.com.br
charles.uol.com.br
eliot.uol.com.br
MX Records:
5: mx-p1.uol.com.br
10: mx-p2.uol.com.br
SOA:Serial: 2015091566, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:relays.uol.com.br -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently lacks any detectable technical infrastructure beyond a minimal HTML skeleton. No CMS, frameworks, or third-party scripts are present. The hosting provider is likely UOL based on name servers, but no performance or mobile optimization data is available. The site requires significant technical development to meet modern web standards and security requirements.
Analyze Another Website