Skip to main content

Is jti.com a Scam? Security Check Results - jti.com Reviews

J

Is jti.com Safe? Security Analysis for Vercel Security Checkpoint

https://jti.com

Check if jti.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
JavaScript
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 2:13:04 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website jti.com is currently inaccessible due to a Vercel Security Checkpoint that verifies the visitor's browser before granting access. This security mechanism blocks the actual website content, preventing extraction of business, contact, or policy information. The domain is well-established, registered since 1992 with Network Solutions, LLC, indicating a legitimate and mature domain. However, no metadata, structured data, or visible content is available to analyze the company's business model, services, or compliance posture. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript-based browser verification hosted on Vercel, but no further technology stack details are accessible. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking, but the domain registration status and DNS setup show no immediate red flags. Overall, the site is currently not analyzable beyond the security checkpoint, limiting insights and scoring.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security checkpoint blocking access, no business intelligence data such as market positioning, competitive advantages, or partnership ecosystem could be extracted. The domain age suggests a longstanding entity, but no direct business information or contact details are available to validate or analyze the company's operations or market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a Vercel Security Checkpoint indicates an active security measure to prevent automated or malicious access, which is a positive security control. However, the lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of security policies, incident response readiness, or compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No security headers or SSL configuration details were extractable from the content. The domain's WHOIS data shows clientTransferProhibited status, which is a good domain security practice. Overall, the security posture appears cautious but cannot be fully assessed.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide a publicly accessible landing page or business overview to enable transparency and analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Vercel Detected

The page is a Vercel Security Checkpoint indicating a browser verification challenge blocking access to the actual website content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Frameworks:
Vercel

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a Vercel security checkpoint page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:194.24.4.18 ip4:194.24.4.19 ip4:194.24.4.25 ip4:93.187.188.229 ip4:93.187.188.230 -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:1mpftc7i@ag.eu.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:1mpftc7i@fr.eu.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.equant.netDNS only
dns2.equant.netDNS only
dns3.equant.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: jti-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:194.24.4.18 ip4:194.24.4.19 ip4:194.24.4.25 ip4:93.187.188.229 ip4:93.187.188.230 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Vercel and uses JavaScript heavily for browser verification. The content is minimal and serves only as a security checkpoint, indicating a modern serverless deployment but limiting content delivery. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable. Performance and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The domain uses Equant name servers, which are reputable. The technical setup prioritizes security but at the cost of accessibility for analysis.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about jti.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website