Is jud56.com Safe? Security Analysis for 广东巨东供应链管理有限公司
Check if jud56.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
广东巨东供应链管理有限公司是一家专注于中越物流服务的综合性供应链管理公司，成立于2007年，拥有超过11年的行业经验。公司提供包括越南进口报关、陆运、海运、空运及仓储等多元化物流服务，面向中越贸易的企业客户。网站内容丰富，展示了公司的核心优势、客户评价及行业资质，体现出较强的市场竞争力和专业性。技术上，网站采用了jQuery和AOS动画库，集成了百度统计和百度商桥在线客服，支持移动端访问，整体技术实现较为现代且性能适中。安全方面，网站启用了HTTPS，但缺乏明显的安全HTTP头和隐私政策，WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名的信任度。建议加强安全策略和合规性建设以提升整体安全和用户信任。
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
该公司在越南物流领域拥有稳固的市场地位，服务超过3000家客户，累计订单超过50000票，显示出良好的业务规模和客户基础。其业务模式涵盖从中国到越南的全链条物流服务，结合自研操作系统提升客户体验。合作伙伴网络广泛，涵盖跨境电商、国际快递及ERP系统等，支持其业务生态。公司定位为中型企业，目标客户为中越贸易相关的B2B企业，具备较强的行业专业性和服务深度。未来增长潜力依赖于加强数字化转型和合规性建设。
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (3)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
网站安全成熟度中等，启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全，但缺少安全HTTP头如CSP、HSTS等，未见隐私政策和漏洞披露机制，存在合规风险。未检测到明显的安全漏洞或敏感信息泄露，但WHOIS信息缺失可能影响域名信誉。建议完善安全头配置，公开隐私和安全政策，建立漏洞响应流程，提升整体安全防护和合规水平。
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
完善网站的隐私政策和Cookie政策，确保符合GDPR等法规要求。
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
广东巨东供应链管理有限公司
广东巨东供应链管理有限公司（WORLD-BEATER INTL LOGISTICS CO.,LTD.）（原名：东莞市巨东物流有限公司）创立于2007年，注册资金1000万。是一家专业的综合性物流服务和供应链管理公司，业务范围涵盖越南物流、进口报关、国际物流、国内物流、仓储管理，物流方案定制等。
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 69 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings