Skip to main content

Is junopharm.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp. Reviews

junopharm.ca favicon

Is junopharm.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Check if junopharm.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareCanadasmall
jQuery 3.7.0Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSnowplow AnalyticsService Worker+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:48:41 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp. operates in the healthcare sector, specializing in licensing and acquiring specialized pharmaceutical products with limited competition and high market entry barriers. The company recently merged with Omega Laboratories Limited to form Juno Pharma Canada Inc, headquartered in Montreal, Quebec. The website serves as a corporate presence to inform stakeholders about the business and directs users to a new website for further engagement. Technically, the site is built on a modern CMS platform (Multiscreensite) and employs contemporary web technologies including service workers for PWA capabilities, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for analytics. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided on the homepage, which impacts user trust and compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and captcha protections, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosures reduce overall security maturity. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content appears professional and business-focused.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.0Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSnowplow AnalyticsService WorkerMapboxreCAPTCHAFriendly CaptchaPhotoSwipe

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Juno Pharmaceuticals holds a niche position in the pharmaceutical licensing and acquisition market in Canada, targeting healthcare professionals and industry stakeholders. The business model focuses on acquiring specialized products with inherent market barriers, suggesting a strategy to maintain competitive advantage through exclusivity. The recent merger indicates growth and consolidation. The website acts primarily as a corporate informational portal with limited direct customer interaction. The lack of detailed contact information and policies suggests a low emphasis on direct consumer engagement or e-commerce. The presence of a related domain (junopharma.com) indicates a transition or expansion of their digital footprint. Overall, the company appears to be a small-sized entity with focused operations in healthcare licensing.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, and service workers are registered to enhance performance and offline capabilities. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and Friendly Captcha indicates attention to bot mitigation on forms, although no forms are present on the homepage. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a notable gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, there are areas for improvement in security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Description:

Juno licenses and acquires specialized pharmaceutical products that have limited competitors and inherent barriers to market entry.

Key Services:
Licensing pharmaceutical productsAcquisition of pharmaceutical products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.0Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerSnowplow AnalyticsService WorkerMapboxreCAPTCHAFriendly CaptchaPhotoSwipe
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • Use of reCAPTCHA and Friendly Captcha for forms

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsSnowplow Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Snowplow Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1396 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.225.128, 3.33.251.168
Name Servers:
ns67.domaincontrol.com
ns68.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2025052900, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:242ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Multiscreensite platform using a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Snowplow for analytics. It employs service workers for PWA functionality and uses Mapbox for mapping services. The site loads CSS and JS asynchronously for performance optimization. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and explicit security headers. The hosting appears to be via a CDN provided by the CMS vendor, ensuring reasonable performance. No forms or interactive data collection elements are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website