Skip to main content

Is jurmalaapartment.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Jurmala Apartment Reviews

jurmalaapartment.lv favicon

Is jurmalaapartment.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Jurmala Apartment

Check if jurmalaapartment.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHACookieYes cookie consent
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:25:28 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Jurmala Apartment is a hospitality business specializing in vacation apartment rentals located in Jurmala, Latvia. The website presents a professional and visually appealing interface built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, targeting tourists seeking quality accommodation in the Jurmala resort area. The business model focuses on providing rental services for vacationers, positioning itself as a niche player in the local hospitality market. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and includes essential features such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for security. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit privacy and terms of service pages indicate room for improvement in security and compliance. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHACookieYes cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets vacationers and tourists interested in renting apartments in Jurmala, Latvia's official resort. Its competitive advantage lies in location-specific offerings and quality living accommodations. The business model is straightforward, relying on direct rental services. The website's use of SEO and structured data suggests an intent to capture organic search traffic effectively. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance. Growth potential exists if the company expands its digital presence and strengthens trust signals.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@jurmalaapartment.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of incident response contacts and security policies indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is unclear due to missing privacy documentation. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing incident response contacts would improve the security maturity significantly.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Jurmala Apartment

Description:

The perfect vacation in Jurmala starts here… Location, Community, Quality Living. It starts here! The apartments are in Jurmala – the only official resort in Latvia.

Key Services:
Apartment rentalsVacation accommodation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle reCAPTCHACookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks:
Elementor page builder
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEOCookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.serveris.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.239.58
Name Servers:
ns1.serveris.lvDNS only
ns2.serveris.lvDNS only
ns3.serveris.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: sa.serveris.lv
20: sa2.serveris.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062501, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:129ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.serveris.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It loads external resources from Google domains and uses CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and caching. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website