Skip to main content

Is kariyer.net a Scam? Security Check Results - kariyer.net Reviews

K

Is kariyer.net Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if kariyer.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
PerimeterX (px-cloud.net captcha)
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:33:04 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.kariyer.net is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) captcha challenge that blocks access to its content. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, technical, or security information from the site. The WHOIS lookup for the domain returned no registration data, indicating either the domain is not registered, the WHOIS server queried does not have the data, or the domain uses privacy protection or other obfuscation. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data severely limits the ability to assess the company's business model, market position, or technical infrastructure. Security posture cannot be evaluated beyond the presence of a WAF challenge, and no privacy or contact policies are detectable. Overall, the site appears to be protected by aggressive security controls but lacks publicly available trust and compliance indicators.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterX (px-cloud.net captcha)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a career or job-related service, but no further details are available. No contact information, certifications, or legal disclosures are present to validate the business operations or market positioning. The lack of transparency and public information is a concern for business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs a PerimeterX WAF captcha challenge, indicating a high level of protection against automated access and potential attacks. However, no other security headers or SSL configuration details are available for review. The absence of privacy policies, contact points for incident response, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited security transparency. The WHOIS data absence further reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is unknown beyond the WAF presence, and the site may be difficult to assess for compliance or vulnerabilities.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Reduce or optimize WAF captcha challenges to allow legitimate user access and enable security assessments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a PerimeterX captcha challenge blocking access to the website content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterX (px-cloud.net captcha)

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to a PerimeterX WAF captcha challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:92.45.35.0/24 ip4:176.235.128.50/32 ip4:213.14.96.225/27 ip4:85.153.149.0/24 include:emarsys.net include:sendgrid.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:dkim(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@kariyer.net
Forensic Reports:dmarc@kariyer.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(336 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:85.153.149.69
Name Servers:
ns63.worldnic.com
ns64.worldnic.com
MX Records:
0: kariyer-net.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 125072407, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:92.45.35.0/24 ip4:176.235.128.50/32 ip4:213.14.96.225/27 ip4:85.153.149.0/24 include:emarsys.net include:sendgrid.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website's technical infrastructure cannot be fully assessed due to the blocking WAF captcha. The only detectable technology is PerimeterX captcha scripts and an image CDN domain. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider information is available. The HTML content is minimal and serves only to deliver the captcha challenge. Performance, accessibility, SEO, and mobile optimization cannot be evaluated. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential registration or data availability issues.
Analyze Another Website