Skip to main content

Is kb-ke.de a Scam? Security Check Results - KB Reviews

kb-ke.de favicon

Is kb-ke.de Safe? Security Analysis for KB

Check if kb-ke.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationGermanymedium
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.4Yoast SEO 25.6CookiebotGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:59:22 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

KB is a German-based company specializing in building construction and infrastructure projects, positioning itself as a reliable partner with over 50 years of experience. The website reflects a professional business model focused on engineering competence and infrastructure development, targeting businesses and stakeholders in the construction and transportation sectors. The company emphasizes its expertise and project partnership capabilities, supported by a modern and well-structured website.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.4Yoast SEO 25.6CookiebotGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and real estate sectors, providing engineering and construction services. The website's content and branding suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The use of multilingual support (German, English, Croatian) indicates a regional or international outreach. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on project partnerships and infrastructure development. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests contact may be handled via dedicated pages or forms not included in the provided content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain, indicating good domain security practices. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance for cookie usage. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics introduces tracking but is managed with user consent. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

KB

Description:

Wir sind die KB - Ihr stabiler Partner in Hochbau -und Infrastrukturprojekten

Key Services:
Hochbau (Building Construction)Infrastrukturprojekte (Infrastructure Projects)Engineering Competence
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.30.4Yoast SEO 25.6CookiebotGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google
Tracking Pixels:
Cookiebot
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:mail.kb-ke.de ip4:80.81.27.110 mx:indivsurvey.de a:webmail.kb-ke.de include:_spf.perfora.net include:_spf.kundenserver.de include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:kb-group.com
Issuer:Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid Until:2/19/2026 (204 days)
SANs:kb-group.com, www.kb-group.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(283 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.55.222.62
AAAA Records:2a01:4f8:c2c:9e83::2
Name Servers:
ns1068.ui-dns.com
ns1093.ui-dns.org
ns1110.ui-dns.de
ns1113.ui-dns.biz
MX Records:
10: mail.kb-ke.de

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:mail.kb-ke.de ip4:80.81.27.110 mx:indivsurvey.de a:webmail.kb-ke.de include:_spf.perfora.net include:_spf.kundenserver.de include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern CMS infrastructure. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted likely via IONOS SE, consistent with the registrar data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses video backgrounds and SVG logos, reflecting a contemporary design approach.
Analyze Another Website