Skip to main content

Is kbl.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - KB Lizings Reviews

K

Is kbl.lv Safe? Security Analysis for KB Lizings

Check if kbl.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQuery 2.0.3jQuery UI 1.10.3Modernizr 2.6.2Less CSSSemantic UI
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:10:08 PM
36
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

KB Lizings operates as a vehicle leasing and used car sales company primarily serving the Latvian market. The website showcases a broad inventory of used vehicles with detailed listings, pricing, and financing options, targeting consumers interested in affordable vehicle leasing and purchase solutions. The business model focuses on providing flexible payment terms and special offers to attract customers. Technically, the website employs older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 2.0.3 and jQuery UI 1.10.3, along with Semantic UI for styling. The site is functional with a clear navigation structure but lacks advanced mobile optimization and modern performance enhancements. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS verification, security headers, and privacy policies, which poses risks to user data protection and trust. No WHOIS data was retrievable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is operational and professional but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.0.3jQuery UI 1.10.3Modernizr 2.6.2Less CSSSemantic UI

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a local player in the transportation sector, specializing in used car sales and leasing in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a wide selection of vehicles sourced from Germany with transparent pricing and payment plans. The business targets individual consumers and possibly small businesses seeking vehicle financing. The website content and structure suggest a straightforward sales approach without extensive digital marketing or analytics integration. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of privacy and security policies may impact customer confidence and limit growth potential in regulated markets.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (4)

e*****@2x.png
v*****@2x.png
d*****@2x.png
t*****@2x.png

Phone Numbers (3)

286*****
261*****
286*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers exposes the website and its users to potential interception and attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The website does not implement consent mechanisms for cookies or data collection. These gaps represent significant risks to user privacy and business reputation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

KB Lizings

Description:

KB Lizings is a vehicle leasing and sales company offering a wide range of used cars primarily sourced from Germany. The business targets customers interested in purchasing or leasing vehicles with flexible payment options.

Key Services:
Used car salesVehicle leasingFinancing options
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.0.3jQuery UI 1.10.3Modernizr 2.6.2Less CSSSemantic UI
Frameworks:
Semantic UI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:94.249.192.60
Name Servers:
ns1.1gb.ruDNS only
ns2.1gb.ruDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.yandex.ru
SOA:Serial: 21, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and Semantic UI, which supports a functional and visually consistent user interface. However, the use of older versions of jQuery and jQuery UI indicates technical debt and potential security risks. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Less CSS for styling. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks like React or Angular. Performance is moderate with some responsive design but limited mobile optimization. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. The site lacks analytics and tracking scripts, which limits marketing insights but also reduces privacy concerns. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content provided.
Analyze Another Website