Skip to main content

Is kce.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA KCE Reviews

S

Is kce.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA KCE

Check if kce.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
WordPressElementorjQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:05:47 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA KCE is a Latvian company established in 2010 specializing in electrical engineering services including design, installation, and maintenance of electrical transmission lines, lightning protection, fire alarm, video surveillance, and access control systems. The company serves clients primarily in the Kurzeme region and employs approximately 30 professionals. The website reflects a stable small business with a clear focus on energy sector services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, with standard web technologies and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features such as a privacy policy or cookie consent. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and contact information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site is professional and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a stable position in the regional electrical installation market with a growing portfolio of services. Its business model focuses on project-based electrical engineering services with a workforce of about 30 employees. The website targets business clients and students in electrical engineering, offering internships and employment. The company maintains a Facebook presence but lacks broader digital marketing or analytics tools. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and trust-building. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@kce.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712544****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA KCE

Registration Number:

41203037327

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to reduce vulnerability risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA KCE

Description:

SIA “KCE” is a Latvian company founded in 2010, specializing in electrical transmission and installation line design and construction, lightning protection systems, fire alarm, video surveillance, notification and access systems design, installation, and maintenance. The company employs about 30 people and offers internships and employment opportunities for electrical engineering students.

Key Services:
Electrical transmission and installation line design and constructionLightning protection system installationFire alarm system design and installationVideo surveillance system design and installationNotification and access system design, installation, and maintenance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:81.198.74.222 include:_spf.online.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:81.198.74.222
Name Servers:
ns.online.lvDNS only
ns2.online.lvDNS only
ns3.online.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: mx.online.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023012700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:234ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:81.198.74.222 include:_spf.online.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder plugin, using jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, and accessibility features are basic. The hosting provider is not identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website