Skip to main content

Is kidsarena.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Kids Arena Reviews

kidsarena.lv favicon

Is kidsarena.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Kids Arena

Check if kidsarena.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:17:46 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Kids Arena is a family entertainment park based in Jelgava, Latvia, providing a variety of attractions including a Ninja park, toddler zone, and party rooms for birthday celebrations. The business targets families with children and operates primarily as a local hospitality and entertainment venue. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, supporting good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and incident response details are missing. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a small local business. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. The site is free from adult or suspicious content and complies with GDPR requirements through privacy and cookie policies.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on children's entertainment and event hosting. Its business model revolves around onsite amusement services and party room rentals, targeting local families and visitors in Jelgava. The website supports online reservations and provides clear contact information, enhancing customer engagement. Social media integration with Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The absence of detailed business registration data limits deeper corporate intelligence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@kidsarena.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712569****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site should improve security header implementation and publish clear security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Kids Arena

Description:

Kids Arena is a family entertainment park located in Jelgava, Latvia, offering various attractions, party rooms for birthday celebrations, a Ninja park, and a toddler zone. They also provide coffee and snacks.

Key Services:
Children's amusement parkBirthday party roomsNinja parkToddler zoneFood and beverage
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerjQuery
Frameworks:
WooCommerce
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.74.196
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072402, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:111ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and Facebook. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The site uses jQuery and other common JavaScript libraries. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized WordPress-based businesses.
Analyze Another Website