Skip to main content

Is kimija.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Pareizā Ķīmija Reviews

kimija.lv favicon

Is kimija.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Pareizā Ķīmija

Check if kimija.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
jQuery 1.7.2Google AnalyticsBootstrapFont Awesome
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:14:24 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Pareizā Ķīmija is a Latvian event agency focused on client collaboration, cultural and art event production, and realization of their own ideas. The company targets Latvian-speaking clients interested in cultural projects and event management. The website is built on Drupal 7 with an outdated jQuery library and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The technical infrastructure is basic with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and use of vulnerable libraries. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating poor compliance with GDPR. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is functional but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.7.2Google AnalyticsBootstrapFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche local market specializing in event production and cultural projects. Its business model is service-based, focusing on collaboration with clients and producing cultural events. The website indicates a small-sized business with moderate branding consistency and trust signals such as social media presence and clear contact details. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business information and policies limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

k*****@kimija.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716721****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low. The website lacks HTTPS enforcement, uses an outdated jQuery version with known vulnerabilities, and does not implement security headers. There are no visible incident response or security policies. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization is a positive aspect but insufficient alone. The site should prioritize upgrading its security infrastructure, implementing HTTPS, and publishing privacy-related documents to improve its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade jQuery and all third-party libraries to supported secure versions.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Pareizā Ķīmija

Description:

Pareizā Ķīmija is a Latvian event agency specializing in client collaboration, cultural and art event production, and realization of their own ideas.

Key Services:
Client collaborationCultural and art event productionIdea realization
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.7.2Google AnalyticsBootstrapFont Awesome
Frameworks:
Drupal 7
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
35/100
Best Practices:
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with outdated jQuery library

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

22 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.65.130
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.latnet.lv
30: mx2.latnet.lv
100: mx3.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:27ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Drupal 7 CMS with multiple CSS and JS imports, including Bootstrap and Font Awesome. It relies on an old jQuery version (1.7.2), which is vulnerable and outdated. Google Analytics is integrated with IP anonymization enabled. The site lacks HTTPS URLs in the provided content, suggesting no SSL or incomplete HTTPS deployment. Performance is moderate with some modern features like lazy loading in the slider. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. The site structure is clear but content is minimal on the homepage, indicating potential technical debt or incomplete development.
Analyze Another Website