Skip to main content

Is kinomaja.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - kinomaja.lv Reviews

kinomaja.lv favicon

Is kinomaja.lv Safe? Security Analysis for KINO MĀJA | Private Cinema Theater

Check if kinomaja.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:57:47 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain www.rijafilms.com appears to be unregistered or expired as indicated by the WHOIS raw data showing 'No match for domain'. The website content provided is incomplete and truncated, lacking critical elements such as privacy policies, contact information, or business descriptions. This severely limits the ability to assess the business operations or technical infrastructure. No security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are found, indicating a lack of publicly available compliance or security posture information. The absence of WHOIS registration data and website content suggests the domain is inactive or placeholder, posing a significant risk for trust and legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration status, ensuring website content availability, and publishing essential compliance and contact information to improve credibility and security posture.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the domain's apparent unregistered status and lack of accessible content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of market positioning, business model, or partnership ecosystem. The site appears intended for film/media content based on the URL path, but no further details are available. The lack of contact details and business information suggests the business is either inactive or not publicly established.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@rijafilms.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

No security headers, SSL configuration details, or security policies are detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data and website content indicates a critical security risk as the domain may be expired or unowned, which can be exploited for phishing or malicious purposes. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The security posture is effectively non-existent based on available data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Verify and renew domain registration to establish ownership and legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

None Detected

WHOIS data indicates domain does not exist or is not registered. The HTML content is truncated and incomplete, indicating content is minimal or blocked. No WAF challenge detected explicitly but content is inaccessible or missing.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data shows domain is not registered or expired.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(149 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.171, 185.230.63.107, 185.230.63.186
Name Servers:
ns0.wixdns.net
ns1.wixdns.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Wix platform as indicated by meta tags and script sources. However, the provided HTML content is truncated and incomplete, limiting technical assessment. No detailed tech stack or performance data is available. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected. The site lacks visible SEO optimization and accessibility features in the accessible content. Hosting provider and CMS are inferred as Wix but no further infrastructure details are available.
Analyze Another Website