Skip to main content

Is kipurisaimnieko.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - mazs top liels Reviews

kipurisaimnieko.lv favicon

Is kipurisaimnieko.lv Safe? Security Analysis for mazs top liels

Check if kipurisaimnieko.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Wix.com Website BuilderFacebook Pixelcore-js polyfillfocus-within-polyfill
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:46:38 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'mazs top liels' represents a small agricultural business based in Latvia, focusing on vegetable, greens, and microgreens cultivation and delivery, alongside event barn rental and a rural life blog. The site is built on the Wix platform, leveraging standard Wix technologies and Facebook Pixel for tracking. While the site is accessible and uses HTTPS, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which impacts its overall security posture and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website serves its niche audience with basic content and functionality but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

Wix.com Website BuilderFacebook Pixelcore-js polyfillfocus-within-polyfill

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets local customers interested in fresh produce and rural event experiences. Its market position appears modest, with a focus on direct delivery and community engagement via a blog. The business model is primarily direct-to-consumer agricultural sales and event hosting. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content is relevant but basic, indicating a small-scale operation with limited digital maturity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is moderate due to HTTPS usage but is weakened by the lack of security headers and absence of privacy and cookie policies. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The presence of Facebook Pixel indicates some user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, posing potential GDPR compliance issues. Incident response and security policy information are missing, suggesting limited preparedness for security incidents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

mazs top liels

Description:

Dārzeņu, zaļumu un mikrozaļumu audzēšana un piegāde, pasākumu šķūnis, blogs par dzīvi laukos

Key Services:
vegetable growinggreens and microgreens deliveryevent barn rentalblog about rural life
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wix.com Website BuilderFacebook Pixelcore-js polyfillfocus-within-polyfill
Platforms:
Wix
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and Facebook Pixel integration.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.107, 185.230.63.186, 185.230.63.171
Name Servers:
ns2.wixdns.netDNS only
ns3.wixdns.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2021022018, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:66ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Wix CMS and hosting, with standard Wix scripts and Facebook Pixel for analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present via meta tags and structured data. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies were detected. The site would benefit from enhanced technical SEO and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website