Skip to main content

Is kittyfix.website3.me a Scam? Security Check Results - kittyfix.website3.me Reviews

kittyfix.website3.me favicon

Is kittyfix.website3.me Safe? Security Analysis for Free Website Builder - Build Your Website for Free

Check if kittyfix.website3.me is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CarouselModernizrGoogle AnalyticsFacebook SDK+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:26:15 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.website3.me is a free website builder platform offering drag and drop tools to create websites that engage visitors and support business growth. The platform targets general users seeking an easy-to-use website creation service. The site employs common web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates analytics services such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and marketing purposes. The technical infrastructure appears moderate in performance with basic mobile optimization and SEO features. Security posture is limited with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance and user data protection. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, although the website content is professional and consistent with its business model. Overall, the site presents moderate risk with recommendations to improve security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CarouselModernizrGoogle AnalyticsFacebook SDKFont Awesome 4.7.0jQuery UIFancyboxDefer.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector as a website builder platform, providing drag and drop tools for website creation. The business model likely relies on freemium or subscription services, targeting small to medium businesses and individuals. The platform integrates marketing and analytics tools to support user engagement and growth. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and good content quality, positioning itself as a user-friendly website creation service.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of outdated jQuery version 1.8.3 may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. The integration of third-party analytics and social media SDKs introduces additional privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Create a website that captivates visitors and grows your business with Website.com, a drag and drop website builder.

Key Services:
drag and drop website building
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CarouselModernizrGoogle AnalyticsFacebook SDKFont Awesome 4.7.0jQuery UIFancyboxDefer.js
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:65.61.198.0/24 ip4:65.61.199.0/24 a:mailsrv101.in2net.com ip4:65.61.217.0/24 include:_hostingspf.website.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:97322180338d402cab1bbb3efdae43e7@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(342 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:198.245.53.228
Name Servers:
gerald.ns.cloudflare.com
jade.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.siteengineserver.com
SOA:Serial: 2378692904, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:65.61.198.0/24 ip4:65.61.199.0/24 a:mailsrv101.in2net.com ip4:65.61.217.0/24 include:_hostingspf.website.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a proprietary CMS platform with a tech stack including jQuery 1.8.3, Bootstrap, Modernizr, and various plugins like Fancybox. The site loads multiple external resources from Google APIs and Facebook, indicating reliance on third-party services. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of CSS and JavaScript to optimize rendering. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are implemented, supporting social sharing and search engine indexing. Accessibility features are minimal. The hosting provider is likely Identity Digital Inc., inferred from WHOIS service references. Technical debt is indicated by the use of outdated jQuery and lack of modern security practices.
Analyze Another Website