Is kleja.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Klusais kempings – Quiet glamping
Check if kleja.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Kleja.lv is a hospitality website offering quiet glamping experiences in Latvia, focusing on yurts, spa services, and curated experiences. The site targets tourists seeking peaceful nature-based accommodation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and OceanWP theme, with several plugins for booking and forms. The site is mobile-optimized and has good design quality. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically niche glamping and eco-tourism in Latvia. It leverages online booking and social media channels like Facebook and Instagram for customer engagement. The business model is direct accommodation and experience sales, with gift cards as an additional revenue stream. Market positioning is focused on quiet, nature-centric tourism. The website content and social presence indicate a small-sized operation with consistent branding and moderate trust signals. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance issues with GDPR or other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Quiet glamping site offering peaceful recreation at the corner of forest in Latvia, featuring yurts, spa, experiences, and gift cards.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site focused on glamping in Latvia.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 41 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings