Skip to main content

Is klt56.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 深圳开利通物流有限公司 Reviews

Is klt56.com Safe? Security Analysis for 深圳开利通物流有限公司

Check if klt56.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationChinasmall
jQuery 1.11.1
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:24:48 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

深圳开利通物流有限公司 is a small logistics and supply chain management company founded in 2020 and based in Shenzhen, China. The company offers a range of services including supply chain platform management, channel design, international freight forwarding, customs agency, and logistics consulting. The website primarily targets a Chinese-speaking audience interested in logistics and related services, but also contains extensive gambling and lottery-related content, which suggests a mixed or unclear business focus. Technically, the website uses basic technologies such as jQuery 1.11.1 and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, but lacks modern security headers and privacy policies. The site is accessible without WAF blocking or security challenges.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation sector with a focus on logistics and supply chain services. The domain age aligns with the company's founding date, indicating consistency. However, the website content heavily features gambling and lottery materials, which may indicate either a secondary business focus or content unrelated to the stated logistics business. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model appears service-oriented with a focus on logistics solutions. The lack of contact emails and limited trust indicators reduce business credibility. External links to suspicious domains may pose reputational risks.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating low compliance with modern security and privacy standards. The use of an outdated JavaScript library (jQuery 1.11.1) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided. SSL configuration is presumed but not verifiable from the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires improvements to protect user data and comply with regulations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

深圳开利通物流有限公司

Description:

深圳开利通物流有限公司成立于2020年07月24日,注册地位于深圳市南山区南头街道马家龙社区南山大道3186号明江大厦C单元五层506室(入驻深圳市可乐商务秘书有限公司),法定代表人为王再新。经营范围包括一般经营项目是:供应链平台管理;供应链渠道设计;物流渠道方案设计;海上、陆路、航空国际货运代理;代理报关服务;代理报检服务;会展会务策划;国内贸易、货物及技术进出口;国内货物运输代理;搬运装卸服务;物流信息咨询;网络营销策划;网络技术开发、技术咨询、技术服务。

Key Services:
supply chain platform managementsupply chain channel designlogistics channel solution designinternational freight forwarding by sea, land, aircustoms declaration agencyinspection agency servicesexhibition and conference planningdomestic trade and import/export of goods and technologydomestic cargo transportation agencyloading and unloading services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.1
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:klt56.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/3/2025 (60 days)
SANs:klt56.com, *.klt56.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.10.11, 172.67.161.230
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3031::6815:a0b, 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a1e6
Name Servers:
anderson.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
jessica.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2377221119, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with jQuery 1.11.1 for scripting. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not enable DNSSEC. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no advanced SEO or accessibility enhancements detected. The presence of multiple external links to suspicious domains may affect security and reputation. Technical debt is evident due to outdated libraries and missing security best practices.
Analyze Another Website