Skip to main content

Is kmz-zak.de a Scam? Security Check Results - kmz-zak.de Reviews

kmz-zak.de favicon

Is kmz-zak.de Safe? Security Analysis for Start - Website

Check if kmz-zak.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherGermanysmall
Contao Open Source CMSCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:45:05 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website kmz-zak.de appears to be a small business site using the Contao Open Source CMS platform, hosted on GoDaddy nameservers. The site content is minimal with no clear business description, contact information, or privacy and cookie policies. The technical infrastructure is basic with no detected advanced frameworks or analytics tools. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site lacks critical compliance and trust indicators, which impacts its credibility and security standing.

Detected Technologies

Contao Open Source CMSCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of detailed business information, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of the entity behind kmz-zak.de. The site targets a German-speaking audience but does not provide clear services or sector information. The lack of contact details and policies suggests a low level of digital maturity and limited customer engagement mechanisms.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is poor. There is no evidence of HTTPS usage or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response contacts. The absence of these elements exposes the site to potential risks including data interception and non-compliance with GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices is a concern.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Contao Open Source CMSCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website uses Contao CMS and is hosted on GoDaddy nameservers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:kmz-zak.de
Issuer:Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Valid Until:3/21/2026 (231 days)
SANs:kmz-zak.de, www.kmz-zak.de

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:92.204.236.132
AAAA Records:2a00:1158:0:384::
Name Servers:
ns45.domaincontrol.com
ns46.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
100: kmzzak-de0i.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024102101, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Contao CMS and standard CSS/JavaScript for layout and styling. Hosting is via GoDaddy as inferred from nameservers. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or marketing tools were detected, indicating minimal tracking or user behavior analysis. Performance is likely moderate given the simple tech stack but no explicit performance data is available.
Analyze Another Website