Skip to main content

Is koimo.com a Scam? Security Check Results - koimo.com Reviews

koimo.com favicon

Is koimo.com Safe? Security Analysis for KOIMO.COM

Check if koimo.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Font Awesome 5.6.3Google Fonts (Oswald, Source Sans Pro)Google reCAPTCHA v2+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 4:01:53 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

KOIMO.COM is a minimalistic business inquiry landing page with a focus on collecting contact information via a web form. The site lacks detailed business information, privacy policies, or terms of service, which limits transparency and trust. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google reCAPTCHA to provide a responsive and secure user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the legitimacy and ownership of the domain. Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS usage and CAPTCHA protection but lacks important security headers and policies. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive compliance and trust indicators.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Font Awesome 5.6.3Google Fonts (Oswald, Source Sans Pro)Google reCAPTCHA v2Google Analytics (UA and GA4)Efty infrastructure scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website appears to serve as a simple contact portal for business inquiries without revealing company identity, sector, or operational details. There is no evidence of a broader business model, partnerships, or market positioning. The lack of contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses suggests limited direct customer engagement. The use of Efty infrastructure indicates domain management via a third-party service, but no WHOIS data is available to confirm ownership. The business intelligence is minimal and insufficient to assess competitive advantages or growth potential.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect its contact form from spam. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The domain's unregistered or hidden WHOIS status further reduces trust and raises potential risk concerns.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

KOIMO.COM - Contact us for any business inquiries

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4.3.1jQuery 3.3.1Font Awesome 5.6.3Google Fonts (Oswald, Source Sans Pro)Google reCAPTCHA v2Google Analytics (UA and GA4)Efty infrastructure scripts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (UA)Google Analytics 4 (GA4)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal landing page focused on business inquiries.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:86.105.245.69
Name Servers:
ns1.eftydns.comDNS only
ns2.eftydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Font Awesome 5.6.3, and Google Fonts for styling and UI. Google Analytics (both UA and GA4) and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is implemented on the contact form to prevent spam. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. No CMS or backend technology is detectable from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data, limiting search engine visibility. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed.
Analyze Another Website