Skip to main content

Is konferencjaenergas.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - konferencjaenergas.pl Reviews

konferencjaenergas.pl favicon

Is konferencjaenergas.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Konferencja Naukowo - Techniczna ENERGAS » Home

Check if konferencjaenergas.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyPolandsmall
JavaScriptjQueryPhotoswipeGoogle FontsService Worker
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 11:23:07 AM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website konferencjaenergas.pl serves as the online presence for the ENERGAS scientific and technical conference, primarily targeting professionals and academics in the energy sector in Poland. The site provides information about the conference and related events but lacks detailed business or organizational information. Technically, the site is built using the WebWave CMS platform and employs standard web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, and Google Fonts. It is mobile optimized and includes a service worker for progressive web app capabilities. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies, which reduces its overall security posture. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryPhotoswipeGoogle FontsService Worker

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The ENERGAS conference website occupies a niche position in the energy sector, focusing on scientific and technical knowledge sharing. Its business model revolves around event organization and promotion, targeting a specialized audience of energy professionals and researchers. The lack of detailed company or organizational data suggests a small-scale operation or event-specific entity. The site does not display partnerships or certifications, and no direct revenue streams or commercial activities are evident. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not discernible from the site content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

e*****@konferencjaenergas.pl

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a service worker registered. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No privacy policy or terms of service are present, which is a compliance concern under GDPR. The lack of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers further limits incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website for the scientific and technical conference ENERGAS, likely focused on energy sector topics.

Key Services:
Conference hostingInformation sharingEvent promotion
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryPhotoswipeGoogle FontsService Worker
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:185.40.197.94/32 ip4:77.95.234.226/29 ip4:79.133.194.22/32 a:mail.webwavecms.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

27/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(329 days)

DNS Records

A Records:185.73.228.142, 185.30.124.158
Name Servers:
ns1.gcorelabs.netDNS only
ns2.gcdn.servicesDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.webwavecms.com
SOA:Serial: 1712749242, TTL: 1600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:185.40.197.94/32 ip4:77.95.234.226/29 ip4:79.133.194.22/32 a:mail.webwavecms.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site is built on the WebWave CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Photoswipe for UI components. Google Fonts are used for typography, and a service worker is registered to enable offline capabilities. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but minimal. Accessibility features are limited but present at a basic level. No advanced frameworks or platforms were detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the content.
Analyze Another Website