Skip to main content

Is konicaminolta.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Konica Minolta Baltia Latvia Reviews

konicaminolta.lv favicon

Is konicaminolta.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Konica Minolta Baltia Latvia

Check if konicaminolta.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatvialarge
Next.jsReactCloudfront CDNUsercentrics (cookie consent)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:57:12 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Konica Minolta Baltia Latvia operates as a regional branch of the global Konica Minolta brand, providing innovative printing, document management, and IT solutions tailored for businesses in Latvia. Their offerings include printer leasing, cloud printing services, document management systems, and professional printing equipment, positioning them as a key technology provider in the local market. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on modern technologies such as Next.js and AWS Cloudfront, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness consistent with a large enterprise brand, though WHOIS data limitations prevent full domain legitimacy verification.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactCloudfront CDNUsercentrics (cookie consent)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets business customers seeking efficient and sustainable printing and document management solutions. Their business model focuses on B2B services with a strong emphasis on innovation and sustainability. The website content and social media presence support a well-established market position. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits insights into domain age and registrant consistency, but the brand alignment and content quality suggest a legitimate and reputable operation. The company benefits from a global parent company, Konica Minolta, Inc., enhancing its credibility and market reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes essential security headers, indicating a good security baseline. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Privacy compliance is robust, with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The overall security score is good, but enhancing incident response readiness and disclosure practices would strengthen the posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Konica Minolta Baltia Latvia

Description:

Konica Minolta develops innovative printing, document management, and IT solutions to optimize business processes and support company growth. They offer services including printer leasing, document management systems, cloud services, and professional printing equipment.

Key Services:
Printer leasingDocument management systemsCloud printing servicesProfessional and production printing equipment
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactCloudfront CDNUsercentrics (cookie consent)
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
AWS Cloudfront
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Usercentrics
Marketing Tools:
Usercentrics cookie consent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.hornetsecurity.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns1.eurodns.comDNS only
ns2.eurodns.comDNS only
MX Records:
40: mx11d.antispameurope.de
20: mx11b.antispameurope.de
10: mx11a.antispameurope.de
30: mx11c.antispameurope.de

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.hornetsecurity.com -all

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN for performance optimization. It features responsive design and accessibility considerations, with proper SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. The use of Usercentrics indicates compliance with cookie consent regulations. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure supports fast loading times and a good user experience. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation around security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website