Skip to main content

Is konkas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Konkas Reviews

konkas.lv favicon

Is konkas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Konkas

Check if konkas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPressElementorPHPjQuerySwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:31:33 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Konkas SIA is a Latvian company specializing in the production and installation of a wide range of construction products aimed at enhancing outdoor and industrial spaces, including pergolas, awnings, sunshades, modular fencing, and industrial curtains. The company targets diverse sectors such as private clients, hospitality (HoReCa), industry, and agriculture, positioning itself as a reliable and professional service provider with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The website reflects a well-structured and professional digital presence, supporting multiple languages and featuring a modern design built on WordPress with Elementor.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorPHPjQuerySwiper.jsGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Konkas operates in a niche market providing tailored construction solutions for outdoor and industrial environments. Their business model revolves around manufacturing and installation services, supported by a portfolio of projects and product offerings. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Ads and Tag Manager to reach its audience. The presence of social media channels like Instagram and YouTube indicates active engagement with customers and brand building. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise founded in 2013, with a clear focus on local markets in Latvia.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@konkas.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712945****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, demonstrating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could impact the company's readiness to handle security incidents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to enhance GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Konkas

Description:

Konkas ražo un uzstāda plašu konstrukciju klāstu vasaras terašu un industriālo telpu labiekārtošanai. Konkas piedāvās vairākus risinājumus un palīdzēs izdarīt labāko izvēli.

Key Services:
Production and installation of pergolasAwnings (markīzes)Sunshades (saulessargi)Vertical screensModular fencingInfrared heatersHangarsIndustrial curtainsPVC gatesPavilions and canopies
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorPHPjQuerySwiper.jsGoogle reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Ads (AW-446063561)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

33/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:78.140.140.200
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1699520867, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:183ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated to protect forms from spam. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence suitable for the company's business needs.
Analyze Another Website