Skip to main content

Is konvertor.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

konvertor.org favicon

Is konvertor.org Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if konvertor.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3Google FontsPlupload+2 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:42:04 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Files-conversion.com is a free online file conversion service primarily focused on video file formats but also offering conversion for audio, images, archives, documents, and more. The site is part of the broader Dan's Tools ecosystem, which provides various web utilities. The business model relies on advertising revenue, with Google Adsense and Ezoic ads integrated into the site. The target audience is general internet users seeking free and easy file conversion tools. The website is functional with a basic but serviceable design and navigation structure.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3Google FontsPluploadGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates in the technology sector, specifically in online utilities and file conversion services. It leverages a free-to-use model supported by advertising, targeting a broad user base globally. The presence of multiple language versions and related domains suggests a strategy to capture diverse markets. The partnership or common ownership with Dan's Tools enhances brand recognition. However, the lack of visible company contact information and WHOIS registration data may limit trust for some users. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its wide format support and free access.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate but could be improved. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure data transmission. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web attacks. No cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy compliance features are evident, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain legitimacy, although the site content appears legitimate and safe.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Files-conversion.com provides free online file conversion services, specializing in video file format conversions among many other file types.

Key Services:
Video file conversionAudio conversionImage conversionArchive conversionDocument conversionPresentation conversionSpreadsheet conversionFont conversioneBook conversion
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3Google FontsPluploadGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseEzoic
Marketing Tools:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides free online file conversion services with a focus on video formats.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

94 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(220 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.202.133.59, 34.200.98.251
Name Servers:
ns-1174.awsdns-18.org
ns-1838.awsdns-37.co.uk
ns-57.awsdns-07.com
ns-924.awsdns-51.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:29ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with Bootstrap 3, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. It integrates Plupload for file uploads and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting assets are served via Cloudfront CDN, improving performance. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but could improve accessibility and SEO features. The design is functional but basic, with room for modernization. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external resources. Technical debt is low but updating libraries and frameworks could enhance security and user experience.
Analyze Another Website