Skip to main content

Is kprkr.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Kieran Parker Reviews

K

Is kprkr.co Safe? Security Analysis for Kieran Parker

Check if kprkr.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdomsmall
Next.jsReactSanity.io (CMS)WOFF2 fonts
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:52:44 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

KPRKR is the personal website of Kieran Parker, a seasoned Product Designer specializing in early-stage startup product development. The site highlights his experience, client portfolio, and unique business model offering equity or revenue share partnerships. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and Sanity.io, delivering a responsive and well-structured user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is fully redacted, typical for personal domains, and does not raise immediate trust concerns given the professional presentation. Overall, the site serves as a credible portfolio and contact point for potential clients.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactSanity.io (CMS)WOFF2 fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets early-stage startups and founders seeking product design expertise with a flexible partnership model. The niche focus on 0 to 1 product launches and equity-based arrangements differentiates the offering. The client list includes reputable organizations, enhancing credibility. The partnership with Monolif studio suggests a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue likely derives from consulting fees and equity stakes. The site’s minimalistic design and lack of extensive marketing tools indicate a boutique consultancy approach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@kprkr.co

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Kieran Parker

Description:

Kieran Parker is a Product Designer with over a decade of experience working with early-stage startups, focusing on early company and product development, partnering with founders to launch products. He offers partnerships based on equity or revenue share and has worked with clients including Mastercard, The Bank of London, NHS, and others.

Key Services:
Product designStartup consultingEquity/revenue share partnerships
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactSanity.io (CMS)WOFF2 fonts
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal portfolio/business site for a product designer.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(167 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
50: mx3.zoho.com
20: mx2.zoho.com
10: mx.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 1706614743, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging Sanity.io as a headless CMS. It uses modern web fonts (WOFF2) and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site does not use a traditional CMS like WordPress, reducing common CMS-related vulnerabilities. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and clean but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website