Skip to main content

Is krinskydesign.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Krinsky Design Reviews

K

Is krinskydesign.com Safe? Security Analysis for Krinsky Design

Check if krinskydesign.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateUnited Statessmall
Next.jsReactSanity CMSSwiper.js
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:52:16 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Krinsky Design is a boutique creative design studio specializing in bespoke branding and marketing solutions for luxury real estate and premium brands primarily in New York and South Florida. The company positions itself as a niche agency delivering strategic branding, identity design, and marketing collateral with a focus on high-end clientele. Their website showcases a professional portfolio of projects and clear contact information, supporting their market presence as a specialized boutique agency. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Next.js and Sanity CMS, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. The site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and multimedia content effectively, providing a fast and engaging user experience. However, some security best practices such as security headers and privacy policies are missing, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS data, slightly reduce the overall trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which is inconsistent with the business's claimed founding date, suggesting possible privacy protection or recent domain registration. Overall, the website is professional and well-designed but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security headers. The domain registration inconsistency warrants further verification to ensure legitimacy and trust. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen security posture and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactSanity CMSSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Krinsky Design operates in the luxury real estate and premium brand sector, targeting high-end developers and marketers in New York and South Florida. Their boutique business model focuses on bespoke branding and marketing services, differentiating through specialized expertise and a curated portfolio. Revenue likely derives from project-based contracts for branding, identity, digital campaigns, and collateral design. The company leverages social media channels like Instagram and LinkedIn to enhance brand visibility and client engagement. The absence of WHOIS data and domain age inconsistency may indicate privacy protection or recent domain acquisition, which should be monitored. The firm appears to maintain a focused partnership ecosystem with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include a well-maintained portfolio and active social presence, positioning them as a reputable boutique agency in their niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

H*****@KrinskyDesign.com

Phone Numbers (1)

603*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of GDPR indicators. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a boutique agency but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Krinsky Design

Description:

Krinsky Design is a boutique creative design studio specializing in branding for exceptional real estate and premium brands in New York and South Florida, delivering exceptional results.

Key Services:
Brand Strategy DevelopmentMarket-Driven Brand PositioningBrand/Property NamingEngaging CopywritingLuxurious Marketing CollateralLogo Identity DesignBrand GuidelinesCorporate CollateralMarketing Floor PlansFact Sheets
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactSanity CMSSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(525 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.com
ns54.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2024070801, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js, React, and Sanity CMS, indicating a modern and scalable technical infrastructure. It leverages Swiper.js for interactive content and uses optimized images and video for rich media presentation. The site is mobile-optimized and performs well with fast loading times. However, no hosting provider information was detected, and security headers are missing, which could be addressed to reduce technical risks. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy best practices but limiting marketing insights. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website