Skip to main content

Is kurpirkt.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - kurpirkt.lv Reviews

kurpirkt.lv favicon

Is kurpirkt.lv Safe? Security Analysis for KurPirkt.lv - Visi interneta veikali. Uzzini, kur pirkt!

Check if kurpirkt.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:08:54 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

KurPirkt.lv is a Latvian e-commerce price comparison and online store catalog website designed to help users find products and compare prices across various Latvian internet stores. The platform targets Latvian online shoppers and offers services such as product search, price comparison, and listings of popular products. The website is primarily in Latvian with an option for a Russian version, indicating a regional focus. The business model centers on aggregating product data from multiple stores to facilitate informed purchasing decisions. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The design is responsive and user-friendly, providing a good user experience on mobile devices. However, the site lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS indications and shows moderate performance and SEO optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL), but no explicit security headers or advanced protections are detected. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or comprehensive privacy compliance features, which may pose compliance risks. Contact information is limited to a single email address in the footer, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Overall, the website is functional and serves its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance, and richer contact information to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

KurPirkt.lv occupies a niche in the Latvian e-commerce market as a price comparison and product catalog aggregator. Its competitive advantage lies in consolidating product availability and pricing from multiple Latvian online stores, simplifying the shopping experience for local consumers. The business model likely generates revenue through affiliate links or advertising, although no explicit monetization details are visible. The target customer segment is Latvian internet users seeking to compare prices before purchasing. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or partner domains are identified. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data. The platform's straightforward approach and regional focus position it as a useful tool within its market segment but with room for expansion and professionalization.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

k*****@kurpirkt.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of KurPirkt.lv is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS, which is fundamental for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces its resilience against common web attacks. The search form includes basic client-side validation but lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens or advanced input sanitization indicators. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. The lack of phone or physical contact details further reduces trust and complicates incident reporting. To improve, the site should implement comprehensive security headers, enhance form security, establish a vulnerability disclosure process, and strengthen privacy compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Latvian price comparison and internet store catalog website helping users find products and compare prices across Latvian online stores.

Key Services:
Product searchPrice comparisonOnline store catalogTop products listing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • Input sanitization on search form (basic JS validation)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Latvian price comparison and online store catalog platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:92.240.68.58 include:aspmx.googlemail.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.68.58
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1492712743, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with external dependencies on Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive CSS rules for various screen sizes, providing a good user experience on mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. SEO is basic, with meta viewport and content-type tags present but no structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph beyond a single image tag. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO metadata. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website