Skip to main content

Is labasziepes.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - labasziepes.lv Reviews

labasziepes.lv favicon

Is labasziepes.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Aromātiskas ziepes - roku darbs | LabasZiepes.lv

Check if labasziepes.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceLatviasmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont LoaderJournal3 theme
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:02:48 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

LabasZiepes.lv is a Latvian e-commerce website specializing in handmade aromatic soaps crafted with natural ingredients such as charcoal, olive oil, and shea butter. The site offers gift cards and delivery services through local carriers like Omniva, Venipak, and DPD. The business targets general consumers interested in natural and artisanal soap products. Technically, the website is built on the OpenCart platform using the Journal3 theme, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site presents a professional and user-friendly shopping experience but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont LoaderJournal3 theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the retail e-commerce sector focusing on natural handmade soaps, a niche market with growing consumer interest in artisanal and eco-friendly products. The website's content and delivery options indicate a local Latvian market focus. The business model is direct-to-consumer online sales with added value through gift cards and multiple delivery options. The lack of visible contact information and corporate details suggests a small or sole proprietorship operation. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of digital marketing and customer behavior analysis. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

z*****@labasziepes.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR for EU-based businesses. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security issues. The presence of Google Analytics scripts indicates user tracking but without visible privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and contact channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Aromātiskas ziepes - roku darbs. Pasūti ar rokām darinātas dabīgas ziepes ar kokogli, olīveļļu, šī sviestu. Ziepes ar aromātiskām eļļām. Dāvanu kartes. Piegāde ar Omniva, Venipak, DPD.

Key Services:
handmade aromatic soapsnatural soaps with charcoal, olive oil, shea buttergift cardsdelivery via Omniva, Venipak, DPD
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont LoaderJournal3 theme
Frameworks:
OpenCart (implied by route structure and theme)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:146.59.13.246
Name Servers:
ns1.labasziepes.lvDNS only
ns2.labasziepes.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025062101, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the OpenCart e-commerce platform with the Journal3 theme, a popular choice for online stores. It uses Google Fonts loaded asynchronously and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, with standard HTML5 and CSS usage but no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks identified. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The lack of security headers and privacy policies are notable technical gaps.
Analyze Another Website