Skip to main content

Is ladomerylab.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Ladomery Lab Reviews

L

Is ladomerylab.org Safe? Security Analysis for Ladomery Lab

Check if ladomerylab.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdomsmall
WordPress 6.8.2PHPLitespeed HostingJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:01:38 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Ladomery Lab is an academic research group specializing in RNA biology and alternative splicing, based at UWE Bristol. The lab focuses on molecular biology research with a strong emphasis on publishing research papers, collaborating with partners, and offering PhD studentships including self-funded and industrial partnership options. The website serves as an information hub for academic and industry audiences interested in RNA biology. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Bricks theme and hosted on a WordPress Litespeed hosting platform. It demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance areas.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2PHPLitespeed HostingJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The lab operates in the education sector with a small size and a niche focus on RNA biology research. Its market position is that of a specialized academic entity with collaborations and partnerships enhancing its research impact. Revenue streams likely include academic grants, PhD funding, and partnerships with industry. The website reflects a professional academic presence with clear content relevant to researchers and students. Partnerships with organizations like the South West UK RNA Club and Learning Deep Learning indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The lab's business model is primarily research and education focused, with opportunities for industrial partnerships in PhD programs.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

M*****@uwe.ac.uk

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and incident response contact information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No signs of malware or phishing were detected. The security score is moderate but improvements are needed to enhance protection and compliance. The lab should consider implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ladomery Lab

Description:

A research group focused on RNA biology including RNA processing, alternative splicing, mRNA export, translation, localisation, stability, RNA interference, and regulatory noncoding RNAs. The group is led by Professor Michael Ladomery and is based at UWE Bristol.

Key Services:
Research in RNA biology and alternative splicingPhD studentships and industrial partnership PhDsPublication of research papers and textbooksCollaborations with academic and industry partners
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2PHPLitespeed HostingJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Bricks Theme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally maintained academic research lab site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:66.94.111.213 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(14 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.73.9.6
Name Servers:
jon.quicns.com
kevin.quicns.com
MX Records:
0: mail.ladomerylab.org
SOA:Serial: 1730463267, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:77ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:66.94.111.213 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Bricks theme, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. Hosting is provided by HostWP.io with Litespeed technology, supporting good performance and scalability. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from further optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for an academic research website but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website