Skip to main content

Is laikacasting.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Laika Reviews

laikacasting.com favicon

Is laikacasting.com Safe? Security Analysis for Laika

Check if laikacasting.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Roboto)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:14:12 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Laika Casting is a small Latvian casting service platform focused on providing a pleasant casting experience primarily for Latvian-speaking users. The website offers portfolio showcases and casting opportunities, targeting individuals interested in modeling or acting. The technical infrastructure relies on common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is limited, with no visible security headers or privacy policies, and the WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive compliance and security measures.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Roboto)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche casting market within Latvia, serving a local audience. Its business model centers on connecting talent with casting opportunities, likely monetizing through application processes or partnerships. The absence of detailed business information and certifications suggests a small-scale operation. Social media integration with Instagram and Facebook supports community engagement. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@laikacasting.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712657****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (assumed from base URL), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are needed to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and verify via external tools.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Laika

Description:

Laika Casting offers pleasant casting experiences, likely in the modeling or acting casting industry.

Key Services:
Casting opportunitiesPortfolio showcase
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Roboto)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:89.111.35.130 ~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.35.130
Name Servers:
ns77.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns78.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025031300, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:184ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:89.111.35.130 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and Google services for analytics and tag management. The HTML structure is basic but functional, with some mobile optimization. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms were detected. Performance is moderate, but there is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The absence of forms limits data collection risks but also reduces interactivity. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website