Skip to main content

Is lake-cup.de a Scam? Security Check Results - domainname.de Reviews

lake-cup.de favicon

Is lake-cup.de Safe? Security Analysis for domainname.de

Check if lake-cup.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanymedium
BootstrapFontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 and v3CSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:33:37 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website ts.domainname.de/lake-cup.de serves as a professional domain brokerage landing page offering the premium domain lake-cup.de for sale. The business operates as a domain broker with a history dating back to 2005, providing secure and fast domain transfers with escrow payment processing. The platform targets individuals and businesses interested in acquiring premium domains, emphasizing trust and security through verified domain badges and multiple payment options. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5, FontAwesome, and Google reCAPTCHA to ensure usability and spam protection. The site is mobile optimized and presents a clear, professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is adequate with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service linked, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is privacy protected under DENIC, typical for domain brokers, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, suitable for its domain brokerage business model.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapFontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 and v3CSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business positions itself as a reputable domain brokerage service with a focus on premium and verified domains. Its competitive advantage lies in secure escrow transactions, fast domain transfers, and a competent service team. Revenue streams are primarily from domain sales and brokerage fees. The target customer segment includes domain investors, businesses seeking brandable domains, and individuals looking for memorable web addresses. The partnership with domainname.de strengthens its market presence and payment processing capabilities. Growth indicators include a well-structured negotiation and bidding system, and a history of operation since 2005. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear trust signals but could enhance transparency by adding direct contact details and cookie consent.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks some recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are areas for improvement. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may also pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to improve resilience and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to reduce XSS risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

domainname.de

Description:

Domain brokerage service offering secure and fast domain name sales with escrow and payment processing.

Key Services:
Domain salesEscrow payment processingFast domain transferCustomer support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapFontAwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA v2 and v3CSSJavaScript
Frameworks:
Bootstrap 5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form spam protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional domain brokerage landing page for lake-cup.de

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailcenter.at
DNS Lookups:1/10
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:5.9.10.78
AAAA Records:2a01:4f8:160:8082::2
Name Servers:
dns1.domainname.deDNS only
dns2.domainname.deDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.domainname.de
SOA:Serial: 2025030401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:77ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailcenter.at

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 for spam prevention. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive layout. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could modernize the platform further. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations.
Analyze Another Website